evidence-review

evidence-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from SubmergeDan/Fact-Shield. It costs 39 tokens per session (313 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A research-evidence checking workflow that examines each claim in a draft against its supporting sources.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to check research conclusions, drafts, or lists of claims and produce a review list with source locations, credibility judgments, and recommended changes.
Why use it?
It helps find unsupported claims, conflicting evidence, and sources that need human review before publication.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to check research conclusions, drafts, or lists of claims and produce a review list with source locations, credibility judgments, and recommended changes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/submergedan/fact-shield/evidence-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add SubmergeDan/Fact-Shield --skill evidence-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SubmergeDan/Fact-Shield

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for evidence-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/submergedan/fact-shield/evidence-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/submergedan/fact-shield/evidence-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/submergedan/fact-shield/evidence-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/submergedan/fact-shield/evidence-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for evidence-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/submergedan/fact-shield/evidence-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/submergedan/fact-shield/evidence-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 39 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 313 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00039 $0.00313
Opus 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00125
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00063
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00031

Measured 2mo ago against content hash cda04c0504fd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

evidence-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agent/skills/evidence-review/SKILL.md · 28 lines

What it actually says

证据复核技能

当用户要求对研究结论、底稿或一组主张做证据复核时使用本技能。

执行步骤

  1. 把待复核的每条主张拆成独立条目并编号。
  2. 对每条主张回查底稿/证据中对应的原文依据;证据不足时明确标注“证据不足”。
  3. 按以下维度输出核验意见:
    • 主张原文
    • 依据来源(链接或文档位置)
    • 来源可信度:高 / 中 / 低,并说明理由
    • 是否存在冲突证据
    • 建议结论:保留 / 修改 / 排除 / 补充取证
  4. 汇总所有条目结论,优先列出需要人工复核的疑点。
  5. 全程不臆造来源;找不到依据时如实说明。

注意事项

  • 本技能为纯指令型技能:按上述步骤使用已有工具(web、memory、document 等)完成复核。
  • 输出使用中文,先给汇总结论,再给逐条明细。
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 28 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A cda04c0504fd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

evidence-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository SubmergeDan/Fact-Shield (12 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 313 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

evidence-review compared with skills from other repositories

evidence-review next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
evidence-reviewSubmergeDan/Fact-ShieldSkill123mo agoMITA39Claude Code, Codex
imagegenopenai/codexSkill133kyesterdayApache-2.0A113Codex
playwright-climicrosoft/playwrightSkill99kyesterdayApache-2.0A19Claude Code
local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginnersSkill79k4d agoMITA200Claude Code, Codex
systematic-debuggingobra/superpowersSkill313k3d agoMITA21Claude Code
next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.jsSkill143kyesterdayMITA95Claude Code
next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.jsSkill143kyesterdayMITA103Claude Code