Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sumithr/sumo-qa --skill sumo-qa-triaging-test-failuresgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sumithr/sumo-qaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sumithr/sumo-qa/sumo-qa-triaging-test-failures)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sumithr/sumo-qa/sumo-qa-triaging-test-failures"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sumithr/sumo-qa/sumo-qa-triaging-test-failures.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00127 | $0.02902 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00063 | $0.01451 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00580 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00290 |
Grade A, and why
sumo-qa-triaging-test-failures scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Triaging test failures
A test is failing or flaky and the cause is unknown. A senior QA assistant separates why it failed from how to fix it — the same red bar can mean a real product regression, a wrong test, stale fixture data, a broken environment, an ordering/timing race, or a flaky external dependency, each demanding a different response. Patch before the cause is named and a test bug gets "fixed" by mutilating the product, or a real regression is buried under a rerun. The output is a cause classification plus the smallest next verification step — never a fix first.
Announce at the start of EVERY turn while this skill is active — triage, isolation-step, rerun-with-hypothesis, hand-off, and refusal turns all open with: "Triaging this failure before any fix." A turn that skips the announce has left the triage discipline.
Output discipline (mandatory)
Inherits the global discipline from using-sumo-qa: output discipline (no internal taxonomy labels — say "the test's own expectation is stale", not "Cause: test_bug"), output economy (findings not framing; one question per turn), knowledge authority hierarchy, specialty-tool fit.
The Iron Law
CLASSIFY, THEN ISOLATE — NEVER FIX FIRST. The first output for any failure is a named cause plus the single smallest next reproduction/isolation step, NOT a patch. Production code is touched ONLY after triage identifies a concrete product-behaviour gap — a specific behaviour the product gets wrong, evidenced by the failure. A test bug, fixture/data, environment/dependency, timing/order, or external-service flake is NOT a product gap and never licenses a production edit. A rerun is allowed only as a stated experiment testing one hypothesis — never "run it again and hope".
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 91 lines · 127 tokens per session scan A ebe1b20b4932
sumo-qa-triaging-test-failures is a skill published in the GitHub repository sumithr/sumo-qa (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 127 tokens to every session and 2,902 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa
QA test a live website with Axon discovery/content evidence plus browser automation when interaction is required. Use when the user wants exploratory QA, form testing, navigation/link checks, responsive checks, performance observations, bug reports, or a pre-launch quality review.
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.
code-review
Reviews code for bugs, security issues, and best practices.
trace
Use when encountering bugs, test failures, runtime errors, broken builds, or "this doesn't work" reports. Systematic root-cause analysis before any patch — never blind-patches symptoms. Standalone, ends with a final-integration review of the fix. Trigger with /hyperflow:trace, "debug this", "find the root cause", "why…
java-code-review
Review Java code for bugs, duplicate code, correctness risks, maintainability improvements, and missing tests. By default review files modified in git; when the user explicitly names files, classes, packages, or a diff, review that scope instead. Generate a detailed review.md report with actionable comments and fixes.
code-review
Review diffs and change sets for bugs, regressions, risks, and missing tests.