Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/summarybotng/summarybot-ng/accessibility-testingnpx skills add summarybotng/summarybot-ng --skill accessibility-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/summarybotng/summarybot-ngWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/summarybotng/summarybot-ng/accessibility-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/summarybotng/summarybot-ng/accessibility-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/summarybotng/summarybot-ng/accessibility-testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00050 | $0.01632 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00816 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00326 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00163 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 224 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Accessibility Testing
<default_to_action> When testing accessibility or ensuring compliance:
- APPLY POUR principles: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust
- TEST with keyboard-only navigation (Tab, Enter, Escape)
- VALIDATE with screen readers (VoiceOver, NVDA, JAWS)
- CHECK color contrast (4.5:1 for text, 3:1 for large text)
- AUTOMATE with axe-core, integrate in CI/CD pipeline
Quick A11y Checklist:
- All images have alt text (or alt="" for decorative)
- All form fields have labels
- Color is never the only indicator
- Focus visible on all interactive elements
- Keyboard navigation works throughout
Critical Success Factors:
- Automated testing catches 30-50% of issues
- Manual testing with real assistive tech required
- Include users with disabilities in testing </default_to_action>
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
- Legal compliance (ADA, Section 508, EU Directive)
- New feature development
- Before release validation
- Accessibility audits
WCAG 2.2 Levels
| Level | Requirement | Target |
|---|---|---|
| A | Basic accessibility | Minimum legal |
| AA | Standard (most orgs) | Industry standard |
| AAA | Enhanced | Specialized sites |
POUR Principles
| Principle | Meaning | Key Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Perceivable | Can perceive content | Alt text, contrast, captions |
| Operable | Can operate UI | Keyboard, no seizures, navigation |
| Understandable | Can understand | Clear labels, predictable, errors |
| Robust | Works with assistive tech | Valid HTML, ARIA |
Color Contrast Requirements
| Content | AA Ratio | AAA Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Normal text | 4.5:1 | 7:1 |
| Large text (18pt+) | 3:1 | 4.5:1 |
| UI components | 3:1 | - |
Keyboard Navigation Testing
// Test all interactive elements reachable via keyboard
test('all interactive elements keyboard accessible', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto('/');
const focusableElements = await page.$$('button, a, input, select, textarea, [tabindex]');
for (const element of focusableElements) {
await element.focus();
const isFocused = await element.evaluate(el => document.activeElement === el);
expect(isFocused).toBe(true);
}
});
// Verify visible focus indicator
test('focus indicator visible', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto('/');
await page.keyboard.press('Tab');
const focusedElement = await page.locator(':focus');
const outline = await focusedElement.evaluate(el =>
getComputedStyle(el).outline
);
expect(outline).not.toBe('none');
});
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 224 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 06e56f1bc35d
accessibility-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository summarybotng/summarybot-ng (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,632 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
accessibility-engineer
You are the Accessibility Engineering Specialist. You ensure digital products are usable by everyone, including people with visual, auditory, motor, and cognitive disabilities. You audit against WCAG 2.2 standards (AA minimum, AAA preferred), implement ARIA patterns, ensure keyboard navigability, test with screen…
Accessibility Auditor
Comprehensive WCAG 2.1 AA compliance testing combining automated axe-core scans with manual keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, and focus management verification.
Accessibility A11y Enhanced
Comprehensive WCAG compliance and accessibility testing covering ARIA, keyboard navigation, screen readers, color contrast, and automated a11y validation.
accessibility-commerce
Make your store usable by everyone with WCAG 2.1 AA compliance — screen reader support, keyboard navigation, and accessible cart and checkout flows.
Axe-core Accessibility Testing
Accessibility testing skill using axe-core and Playwright for automated WCAG 2.1 compliance auditing, custom rules, and accessibility reporting.
a11y-testing
Automated accessibility testing with axe-core, Playwright, and jest-axe for WCAG compliance. Use when adding or validating a11y tests, running WCAG checks, or auditing UI accessibility.