Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add summarybotng/summarybot-ng --skill mutation-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/summarybotng/summarybot-ngWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/summarybotng/summarybot-ng/mutation-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/summarybotng/summarybot-ng/mutation-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/summarybotng/summarybot-ng/mutation-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/summarybotng/summarybot-ng/mutation-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/summarybotng/summarybot-ng/mutation-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01482 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00593 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00296 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00148 |
Grade A, and why
mutation-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 237 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mutation Testing
<default_to_action> When validating test quality or improving test effectiveness:
- MUTATE code (change + to -, >= to >, remove statements)
- RUN tests against each mutant
- VERIFY tests catch mutations (kill mutants)
- IDENTIFY surviving mutants (tests need improvement)
- STRENGTHEN tests to kill surviving mutants
Quick Mutation Metrics:
- Mutation Score = Killed / (Killed + Survived)
- Target: > 80% mutation score
- Surviving mutants = weak tests
Critical Success Factors:
- High coverage ≠ good tests (100% coverage, 0% assertions)
- Mutation testing proves tests actually catch bugs
- Focus on critical code paths first </default_to_action>
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
- Evaluating test suite quality
- Finding gaps in test assertions
- Proving tests catch bugs
- Before critical releases
Mutation Score Interpretation
| Score | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 90%+ | Excellent test quality |
| 80-90% | Good, minor improvements |
| 60-80% | Needs attention |
| < 60% | Significant gaps |
Common Mutation Operators
| Category | Original | Mutant |
|---|---|---|
| Arithmetic | a + b |
a - b |
| Relational | x >= 18 |
x > 18 |
| Logical | a && b |
a || b |
| Conditional | if (x) |
if (true) |
| Statement | return x |
(removed) |
How Mutation Testing Works
// Original code
function isAdult(age) {
return age >= 18; // ← Mutant: change >= to >
}
// Strong test (catches mutation)
test('18 is adult', () => {
expect(isAdult(18)).toBe(true); // Kills mutant!
});
// Weak test (mutation survives)
test('19 is adult', () => {
expect(isAdult(19)).toBe(true); // Doesn't catch >= vs >
});
// Surviving mutant → Test needs boundary value
Using Stryker
# Install
npm install --save-dev @stryker-mutator/core @stryker-mutator/jest-runner
# Initialize
npx stryker init
Configuration:
{
"packageManager": "npm",
"reporters": ["html", "clear-text", "progress"],
"testRunner": "jest",
"coverageAnalysis": "perTest",
"mutate": [
"src/**/*.ts",
"!src/**/*.spec.ts"
],
"thresholds": {
"high": 90,
"low": 70,
"break": 60
}
}
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 237 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 293a26497acb
mutation-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository summarybotng/summarybot-ng (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,482 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
accessibility-testing
WCAG 2.2 compliance testing, screen reader validation, and inclusive design verification. Use when ensuring legal compliance (ADA, Section 508), testing for disabilities, or building accessible applications for 1 billion disabled users globally.
database-testing
Database schema validation, data integrity testing, migration testing, transaction isolation, and query performance. Use when testing data persistence, ensuring referential integrity, or validating database migrations.
chaos-engineering-resilience
Chaos engineering principles, controlled failure injection, resilience testing, and system recovery validation. Use when testing distributed systems, building confidence in fault tolerance, or validating disaster recovery.
compatibility-testing
Cross-browser, cross-platform, and cross-device compatibility testing ensuring consistent experience across environments. Use when validating browser support, testing responsive design, or ensuring platform compatibility.
bashunit
Write and run tests for bash scripts with bashunit. Use when adding or fixing tests for shell code, when a bashunit run fails, or when asked to raise coverage of a bash script. Covers loading the code under test, the assertion catalogue, the fast edit-run loop, and the API traps that produce silently-passing tests.
software-test-review
Evaluate the quality of TDD tests against slice acceptance criteria, codebase conventions, and Red-phase execution results, producing a structured review with Accept or Revise recommendations. Use when tests written during the Red phase of red-green-refactor need quality review — checking coverage of acceptance…