Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add SummerSec/SumSec-Skills --skill output-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SummerSec/SumSec-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/summersec/sumsec-skills/output-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/summersec/sumsec-skills/output-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/summersec/sumsec-skills/output-skill.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00566 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00283 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
full-output-enforcement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to full-output-enforcement — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 50 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Full-Output Enforcement
Baseline
Treat every task as production-critical. A partial output is a broken output. Do not optimize for brevity — optimize for completeness. If the user asks for a full file, deliver the full file. If the user asks for 5 components, deliver 5 components. No exceptions.
Banned Output Patterns
The following patterns are hard failures. Never produce them:
In code blocks: // ..., // rest of code, // implement here, // TODO, /* ... */, // similar to above, // continue pattern, // add more as needed, bare ... standing in for omitted code
In prose: "Let me know if you want me to continue", "I can provide more details if needed", "for brevity", "the rest follows the same pattern", "similarly for the remaining", "and so on" (when replacing actual content), "I'll leave that as an exercise"
Structural shortcuts: Outputting a skeleton when the request was for a full implementation. Showing the first and last section while skipping the middle. Replacing repeated logic with one example and a description. Describing what code should do instead of writing it.
Execution Process
- Scope — Read the full request. Count how many distinct deliverables are expected (files, functions, sections, answers). Lock that number.
- Build — Generate every deliverable completely. No partial drafts, no "you can extend this later."
- Cross-check — Before output, re-read the original request. Compare your deliverable count against the scope count. If anything is missing, add it before responding.
Handling Long Outputs
When a response approaches the token limit:
- Do not compress remaining sections to squeeze them in.
- Do not skip ahead to a conclusion.
- Write at full quality up to a clean breakpoint (end of a function, end of a file, end of a section).
- End with:
[PAUSED — X of Y complete. Send "continue" to resume from: next section name]
On "continue", pick up exactly where you stopped. No recap, no repetition.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 50 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A e5bf48b1ae56
full-output-enforcement is a skill published in the GitHub repository SummerSec/SumSec-Skills (8 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 566 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to full-output-enforcement, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
dsh-sdk-upgrade
Safely select and install a compatible official @deepseek-ai SDK release for dsh plugin projects (dsh-web, dsh-trading, and similar monorepos) from npm using an isolated worktree, explicit cohort review, CI-equivalent validation, and controlled rollout — including syncing the project's declared DSH host-version floor…
dsh-web-sdk-compatibility
Adapt and repair dsh-web after an approved official @deepseek-ai SDK/runtime cohort is selected or installed. Compare public API, type, service-injection, module-table, protocol, and behavior changes; map every change to repository consumers; implement the smallest fixes and durable compatibility contracts; handle…
ov-experience-memory
Retrieve and apply OpenViking Experience memories through the Agent runtime's generic OpenViking search and read tools. Use before or during executable, multi-step, or tool-based work such as coding, file or data changes, configuration, deployment, workflow execution, and failure recovery when prior operational…
audit-playbook
A code-security audit playbook covering source-code review, runtime checks, software dependencies, deployment settings, and AI-agent security risks.
x64dbg-reversing
Perform dynamic reverse engineering and debugging using X64dbg/X32dbg through natural language commands powered by X64dbg MCP. Use this skill whenever the user wants to: debug executables, analyze program behavior at runtime, set breakpoints, inspect memory and registers, trace execution flow, bypass anti-debug…
ctf-playbook
A playbook for solving capture-the-flag challenges, where competitors find a hidden proof string called a flag.