Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sun2443/designer-skillsnpx agentmods add skills/sun2443/designer-skills/legal-responseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sun2443/designer-skills/legal-response)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sun2443/designer-skills/legal-response"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sun2443/designer-skills/legal-response/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sun2443/designer-skills/legal-response"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sun2443/designer-skills/legal-response.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.03355 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.01342 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00671 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00335 |
Grade A, and why
legal-response scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to legal-response — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 458 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/legal-response -- Generate Response from Templates
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Generate a response to a common legal inquiry using configured templates. Customizes the response with specific details and includes escalation triggers for situations that should not use a templated response.
Important: This command assists with legal workflows but does not provide legal advice. Generated responses should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals before being sent, especially for regulated communications.
Invocation
/legal-response [inquiry-type]
Common inquiry types:
dsrordata-subject-request-- Data subject access/deletion/correction requestsholdordiscovery-hold-- Litigation hold noticesvendororvendor-question-- Vendor legal questionsndaornda-request-- NDA requests from business teamsprivacyorprivacy-inquiry-- Privacy-related questionssubpoena-- Subpoena or legal process responsesinsurance-- Insurance claim notificationscustom-- Use a custom template
If no inquiry type is provided, ask the user what type of response they need and show available categories.
Workflow
Step 1: Identify Inquiry Type
Accept the inquiry type from the user. If the type is ambiguous, show available categories and ask for clarification.
Step 2: Load Template
Look for templates in local settings (e.g., legal.local.md or a templates directory).
If templates are configured:
- Load the appropriate template for the inquiry type
- Identify required variables (recipient name, dates, specific details)
If no templates are configured:
- Inform the user that no templates were found for this inquiry type
- Offer to help create a template (see Template Creation Guide below)
- Provide a reasonable default response structure based on the inquiry type
Step 3: Check Escalation Triggers
Before generating any response, evaluate whether this situation has characteristics that should NOT use a templated response.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 458 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A b3a0585ee00a
legal-response is a skill published in the GitHub repository sun2443/designer-skills (0 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 3,355 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to legal-response, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
fto-triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.