Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Sundeepg98/kite-mcp-server --skill options-sanity-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sundeepg98/kite-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sundeepg98/kite-mcp-server/options-sanity-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sundeepg98/kite-mcp-server/options-sanity-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sundeepg98/kite-mcp-server/options-sanity-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sundeepg98/kite-mcp-server/options-sanity-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sundeepg98/kite-mcp-server/options-sanity-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00119 | $0.01242 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00621 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00248 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00124 |
Grade C, and why
options-sanity-check scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Tells the agent never to refusehighAnti-refusal
Suppressing the ability to decline removes a core safety control; a later harmful request then succeeds.
options module before proceeding. Don't refuse to help, but flag the education gap. How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Options Sanity Check (NIFTY / BANKNIFTY / Stock F&O)
Options are high-gamma, high-theta instruments. This skill forces the user to look at Greeks, liquidity, and margin before clicking. It is NOT a trade recommender.
1. Identify the leg(s)
From the user's prompt, extract each leg:
- Underlying (NIFTY, BANKNIFTY, RELIANCE, etc.)
- Expiry (weekly or monthly — ask if ambiguous)
- Strike
- Option type (CE = call, PE = put)
- Side (BUY or SELL)
- Lots (not shares — NIFTY lot size changes, confirm)
If the user says "sell 24500 PE expiring next Thursday", that's one leg. Multi-leg strategies (straddle, strangle, spread, iron condor, butterfly) are 2-4 legs.
2. Pull the chain + Greeks
- Call
get_option_chainfor the underlying + expiry — returns strikes, OI, IV. - Call
options_greeksfor the specific leg(s) — returns delta, gamma, theta, vega, IV using Black-Scholes. - For multi-leg strategies, call
options_payoff_builder— returns payoff diagram points, max profit, max loss, breakevens. - Call
get_quoteson each leg for bid/ask spread and volume (liquidity check). - Call
get_order_margins(orget_basket_marginsfor multi-leg) — options margins differ wildly between buy and sell.
3. Present the sanity report
## Options Sanity Check: <strategy name or leg summary>
### Legs
1. <BUY|SELL> <lots> <underlying> <expiry> <strike> <CE|PE> @ <current premium>
2. ...
### Greeks (per leg, for 1 lot)
| Leg | Delta | Gamma | Theta | Vega | IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | <d> | <g> | <t>/day | <v> | <iv>% |
### Liquidity
- Bid-ask spread: <pct>% of premium — flag if >5%
- Today's volume: <n> contracts — flag if <100
- Open interest: <n>
### Payoff (multi-leg)
- Max profit: <amt> at <underlying price>
- Max loss: <amt> at <underlying price>
- Breakeven(s): <price1>, <price2>
- Net premium: debit <amt> | credit <amt>
### Margin
- Required (SPAN+Exposure): <amt>
- Available: <amt>
- Utilization after: <pct>%
### Risk Flags
<Only include applicable:>
- IV in top quintile — short-vol strategies face mean reversion risk
- IV in bottom quintile — long-vol strategies face decay without catalyst
- Theta > <X>% of premium/day — time decay is significant
- Undefined-risk leg (naked SELL without hedge) — margin locks up, tail risk is infinite
- Expiry within 7 days — gamma acceleration / pin risk
- Wide bid-ask — execution slippage likely
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 109 lines · 119 tokens per session scan C ffb06fc1a1fd
options-sanity-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository Sundeepg98/kite-mcp-server (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 119 tokens to every session and 1,242 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (tells the agent never to refuse). It comes from a forked repository.
Other skills, from other repositories
quant-mathematician
You are a world-class applied mathematician, statistical researcher, and quantitative strategy architect.
position-optimizer
You are a top 0.1% quantitative position-sizing and risk-optimization agent.
ai-trading-agent
You are an AI trading research assistant connected to Trader Dev MCP.
strategy-optimizer
You are a top 0.1% quantitative strategy optimization agent.
mean-reversion-engineer
You are a top 0.1% quantitative trading engineer and Pine Script developer.
ai-hedge-fund
You are the manager of an AI-powered hedge fund research desk.