Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sungurerdim/dev-skills --skill ds-docsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sungurerdim/dev-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-docs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-docs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.05262 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.02105 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.01052 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00526 |
Grade A, and why
ds-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 228 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/ds-docs
Documentation drifts from code the moment it's written, decisions evaporate with no paper trail, and AI-harness context files silently bloat past the point they help. This skill detects the gaps, verifies claims against source code, tracks architecture decisions, and keeps harness context files signal-dense.
Documentation & Decision Integrity — doc-drift verification, gap generation, ADR tracking, harness-context-file curation.
Completion Evidence — applies to every phase: Report
done/OKonly with the machine-checkable evidence the gates name — the exact command run and its observed output (orfile:linediff). Missing evidence → reportINCOMPLETEplus what is missing. Self-assessment is never evidence. (This band repeats at file end by design — both copies are normative.)
Triggers
- User runs
/ds-docs, asks to check, generate, or improve documentation, asks "what docs are missing" / "is the README up to date", or asks to verify documentation accuracy against source code
Triggers — INVOKE / DON'T INVOKE
| INVOKE | DON'T INVOKE |
|---|---|
| "audit documentation gaps", "is README up to date" | "audit code quality" (→ ds-review) |
| "generate API docs from source" | "write marketing copy / landing page" (→ external / manual) |
| "verify docs against code (no drift)" | "test the documented examples" (→ ds-test) |
| "write ADR for this decision" | "research industry best practices" (→ ds-research) |
| "audit/trim my CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md", "optimize my agent instructions file" | "configure harness permissions or install tools" (→ ds-rig) |
Contract
Dimensions: B5 (getting-started), B6, C3 (templates), C5 (deprecation), A10 (API doc completeness), D10 (support docs)
- Every generated sentence must earn its place — no filler, marketing language, or obvious statements.
- Only generates/modifies documentation files — never touches source code.
- Verifies claims against actual source code before writing.
- Standalone. Uses blueprint profile when available;
ds/audit/findings.mdonly when fresh (git_hash == HEADAND current run-cycle); own analysis otherwise. - Full accounting enforced: every finding and planned check ends in an explicit disposition (fixed / skipped + reason / only you can do); summary totals balance.
- Pre-existing / out-of-scope errors detected during work are NOT skipped — fixed inline or escalated with concrete blocker.
- State-exempt: generated docs on disk are the progress record; re-running naturally resumes.
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- README.md 2.3 KB
- references/gap-analysis.md 7.3 KB
- references/rules-writing.md 25 KB
- references/scope-adr.md 2.5 KB
- references/scope-harness.md 3.3 KB
- references/template-breach-notification.md 6.5 KB
- references/template-dpia.md 5.7 KB
- references/template-privacy-policy.md 5.0 KB
- references/template-processor-registry.md 5.4 KB
- references/template-store-privacy-labels.md 5.3 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -94 lines · +25 tokens per session aeb56325c896
- 1mo ago First seen · 322 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A a61438d2b2bd
ds-docs is a skill published in the GitHub repository sungurerdim/dev-skills (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 5,262 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ring:migrating-to-lib-observability
Migrating a Lerian Go app off lib-commons observability imports (deprecated shims or removed APIs) to lib-observability via a fixed mapping table, then bumps go.mod and validates the build; ring:backend-go applies the edits. Covers log/zap/runtime/assert, opentelemetry/tracing, HTTP middleware, context helpers, and…
ring:exploring-codebases
Exploring a codebase across phases: scopes the target, detects architecture, components, and layers, deep-dives each discovered perspective, then synthesizes findings into actionable guidance with file:line evidence. Use to understand how a feature or system works before planning changes, or to orient on an unfamiliar…
ring:searching-code
Forensic code search and analysis with optional Chain of Draft (CoD) ultra-concise mode. Five-phase methodology (clarification, planning, execution, analysis, synthesis) with severity assessment. Use for targeted investigation of specific patterns, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Skip for broad architecture mapping (use…
ring:mapping-streaming-events
Mapping the eventable points in a Lerian Go service where lib-streaming should emit past-tense, durable, tenant-scoped business events, producing a PM-validated event catalog and instrumentation-map.json for ring:instrumenting-streaming-events. Three-pass discovery (Survey, Slice, Mark) with a scope fence and delivery…
ring:instrumenting-streaming-events
Instrumenting streaming events: wires lib-streaming event emission end-to-end into a Lerian Go service via a 13-gate cycle (catalog, Builder bootstrap, Emit sites, outbox, HTTP manifest, NoopEmitter fallback, integration and chaos tests), dispatching ring:backend-go under TDD. Consumes the validated…
ring:planning-codebase-simplification
Planning a whole-codebase simplification: audits a Go/TS codebase for needless abstraction and emits a KILL/REVIEW/KEEP plan plus a ring:running-dev-cycle task array. Plans only — no edits. Detects single-impl interfaces, pass-through shims, translation-free adapters, and dead-code cascade chains under an inverted…