LegalWork - legal AI workbench
This repository also configures its own agents. See what legalwork tells them →
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Ensures a stalking horse asset purchase agreement issues memo consistently applies four analytical elements to each issue — problem identification, legal or contractual basis, impact on the estate, and recommended resolution — with attention to environmental successor-liability risk, material adverse effect carve-out…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Ensures a preference exposure review memo checks the preparer's calculations, identifies transfers that may be subject to extended look-back treatment, applies the correct limitations period for avoidance actions, and confirms that only qualifying post-transfer new value is credited.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Redline analysis where the baseline omits a systematic risk-shift narrative, issue severity ratings, and the playbook-grounded rationale needed for a negotiation-ready memo.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Three-document cross-check where the baseline typically performs only pairwise comparisons and misses conflicts that surface only when all three documents are read together.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Checklist-driven closing review where the baseline misses document-level defects such as mismatched parties, stale certificates, identifier mismatches, and similar defects, and fails to produce a severity-tiered remediation plan.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Year-over-year annual report comparison memo where the baseline identifies numerical changes but misses disclosure triggers and related compliance analysis that the partner's instructions require.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Registration statement staleness review that compares a draft against prior filings, checks intervening disclosures for material updates, and evaluates whether the filing remains internally consistent and procedurally complete.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
S-1 form check for a registration statement where the baseline identifies surface-level omissions but does not fully test internal consistency of financial tables, ownership disclosures, dilution computations, and other structure-dependent disclosures against the supporting record.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Form 10-K drafting task with a companion issues memo required, where the baseline drafts narrative from individual source documents without reconciling cross-document discrepancies or flagging open items for company input.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Comfort letter request drafting where the baseline fails to differentiate the procedures available for each type of financial period and does not address the privity and addressee rules that govern who may receive the letter.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Form 8-K drafting task focused on identifying all triggered items from a reported transaction, drafting each item with the required disclosures, and preparing a cover memorandum that flags discrepancies, inconsistencies, or arithmetic errors in the source materials.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Equity incentive plan drafting where the baseline produces a plan document but omits a companion drafting memo resolving conflicts among multiple source documents and flagging statutory, governance, and capitalization nuances.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
High-yield indenture drafting from a precedent and multiple deal documents, requiring a companion issues memo that resolves cross-document discrepancies in economic terms and covenant definitions.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
ICFR policy drafting from multiple source documents identifying distinct weaknesses, requiring a COSO-mapped policy that remediates each weakness and includes an implementation timeline.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Closing opinion letter for a Rule 144A / Regulation S offering where the baseline adapts a model template but does not resolve cross-document discrepancies embedded in the opinion's assumptions or address missing closing deliverables.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Purchaser-perspective indenture markup where the baseline redlines obvious economic deviations from the playbook but may miss additional purchaser-protective structural provisions that experienced counsel commonly add.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Issuer-perspective underwriting agreement markup where the baseline redlines identify deviations from the playbook and document the basis for each change without converting the skill into an answer key.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Comprehensive proxy statement drafting from multiple source documents where the baseline produces the core disclosure sections but may miss additional disclosure obligations arising from the company’s governance and compensation profile.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
DEF 14A proxy statement drafting for an annual meeting with a contested director election; the baseline produces standard narrative sections but does not fully verify tabular consistency, shareholder-proposal handling, or governance disclosures tied to the company’s specific profile.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Form 10-Q drafting from multiple source documents where the baseline populates standard sections but may miss disclosure obligations triggered by events during the quarter, such as acquisitions, regulatory matters, workforce changes, system migrations, or subsequent events.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Form S-1 drafting where the baseline produces a structurally complete prospectus but does not apply structure-specific disclosure requirements or produce the companion issues memo identifying cross-document discrepancies.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
SEC comment letter response drafting where the baseline addresses each comment narratively but omits the standard representation, draft-ready proposed disclosure language, and the privileged internal strategy memo.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Firm-commitment underwriting agreement drafting for an IPO where the baseline populates economic terms but omits deal-specific provisions required by the transaction structure and source documents, and does not produce the companion issues memo.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Section 16 filing extraction where the baseline captures reported transaction data, but the workflow also checks arithmetic consistency, ownership computations, timing, indirect ownership, derivative terms, and potential short-swing exposure at a procedural level.
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: