Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Supreme-Ultimate/novel-to-script-team --skill compliance-review-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Supreme-Ultimate/novel-to-script-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/supreme-ultimate/novel-to-script-team/compliance-review-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/supreme-ultimate/novel-to-script-team/compliance-review-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/supreme-ultimate/novel-to-script-team/compliance-review-skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/supreme-ultimate/novel-to-script-team/compliance-review-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/supreme-ultimate/novel-to-script-team/compliance-review-skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01502 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00751 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00300 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00150 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-review-skill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
合规审核技能
必读
../../references/00-first-principles.md../../references/05-compliance-boundaries.md
审核维度
1. 题材合规
检查剧本题材是否触碰红线:
- ❌ 政治敏感(领导人、政治事件、体制批评)
- ❌ 历史虚无(篡改历史、丑化英雄)
- ❌ 宗教迷信(封建迷信、宗教冲突)
- ❌ 暴力血腥(详细描写暴力、血腥场面)
- ❌ 色情低俗(性暗示、低俗内容)
- ❌ 违法犯罪(美化犯罪、教唆违法)
2. 台词合规
检查对话和旁白是否包含敏感内容:
- ❌ 脏话粗口(国骂、地域歧视、人身攻击)
- ❌ 敏感词汇(政治敏感词、违禁词)
- ❌ 价值观问题(拜金主义、三观不正)
- ❌ 歧视性语言(性别歧视、种族歧视、残疾歧视)
3. 画面合规
检查场景描述和视觉元素是否合规:
- ❌ 敏感符号(纳粹标志、宗教符号)
- ❌ 暴力画面(血腥、残忍、虐待)
- ❌ 低俗画面(裸露、性暗示)
- ❌ 违法画面(吸毒、赌博、犯罪)
4. 价值导向
检查剧本传递的价值观是否正向:
- ✅ 正能量(积极向上、励志)
- ✅ 正确价值观(公平正义、诚信友善)
- ❌ 负面价值观(拜金、仇恨、报复)
- ❌ 三观不正(婚外情、小三上位、道德败坏)
执行流程
Step 1: 题材审核
阅读剧本大纲和分集规划,检查:
- 故事背景是否涉及敏感题材
- 主要情节是否触碰红线
- 人物设定是否存在问题
Step 2: 台词审核
逐场景检查对话和旁白:
- 使用敏感词检测(参考references/05-compliance-boundaries.md中的敏感词表)
- 检查价值观导向
- 识别歧视性语言
Step 3: 画面审核
检查场景描述和视觉元素:
- 场景设定是否合规
- 人物动作是否合规
- 道具和背景是否包含敏感元素
Step 4: 整体评估
综合评估剧本的合规性:
- 是否存在优先级1问题(必须修改)
- 是否存在优先级2问题(建议修改)
- 是否存在优先级3问题(可选优化)
输出格式
PASS示例
## 合规审核结果:✅ PASS
### 题材合规:✅ PASS
- 现代都市复仇题材,无敏感内容
### 台词合规:✅ PASS
- 对话健康,无脏话粗口
- 无敏感词汇
### 画面合规:✅ PASS
- 场景描述合规,无暴力血腥
- 无低俗画面
### 价值导向:✅ PASS
- 传递正能量,主角通过努力实现逆袭
- 价值观正确
FAIL示例
## 合规审核结果:❌ FAIL
### 题材合规:✅ PASS
### 台词合规:❌ FAIL
**问题1(优先级1)**:
- 位置:第3场景,林雪台词
- 问题:使用了脏话"你个贱人"
- 修改建议:改为"你这个女人"或"你"
**问题2(优先级2)**:
- 位置:第5场景,旁白
- 问题:价值观问题,"有钱就是王道"
- 修改建议:改为"实力才是硬道理"
### 画面合规:❌ FAIL
**问题3(优先级1)**:
- 位置:第4场景
- 问题:描写了详细的暴力场面"鲜血喷溅"
- 修改建议:改为"被推倒在地",删除血腥描写
### 价值导向:⚠️ 需注意
- 主角复仇手段过于极端,建议增加法律途径的尝试
- 避免传递"以暴制暴"的负面价值观
### 修改要求
1. 必须修改所有优先级1问题(3个)
2. 建议修改优先级2问题(1个)
3. 修改后重新提交审核
判断标准
PASS标准
- 无优先级1问题(红线问题)
- 优先级2问题 ≤ 2个(且已有替代方案)
- 整体价值导向正确
FAIL标准
- 存在任何优先级1问题
- 优先级2问题 > 2个
- 整体价值导向有问题
常见问题和替代方案
脏话粗口替代
- "贱人" → "这个女人"
- "混蛋" → "你"
- "去死" → "滚开"
暴力描写替代
- "鲜血喷溅" → "倒在地上"
- "刀刺入胸口" → "被刀威胁"
- "拳打脚踢" → "推搡争执"
价值观问题替代
- "有钱就是王道" → "实力才是硬道理"
- "不择手段" → "全力以赴"
- "报复" → "讨回公道"
注意事项
- 严格执行:合规审核是底线,任何红线问题必须修改
- 提供替代方案:FAIL时必须给出具体的替代表达建议
- 价值导向:除了规避红线,还要确保传递正确价值观
- 平台差异:不同平台的合规标准可能不同,以最严格标准为准
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 160 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 08899b46714c
compliance-review-skill is a skill published in the GitHub repository Supreme-Ultimate/novel-to-script-team (167 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,502 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…