Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Supreme-Ultimate/novel-to-script-team --skill script-review-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Supreme-Ultimate/novel-to-script-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/supreme-ultimate/novel-to-script-team/script-review-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/supreme-ultimate/novel-to-script-team/script-review-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/supreme-ultimate/novel-to-script-team/script-review-skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/supreme-ultimate/novel-to-script-team/script-review-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/supreme-ultimate/novel-to-script-team/script-review-skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00982 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00491 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00196 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
script-review-skill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
业务审核技能
必读
../../references/00-first-principles.md../../references/04-review-gates.md
执行流程
单集审核流程（~write N）
在写集阶段，执行快速审核：
-
业务审核（由
review-director执行）- 检查节奏、冲突、人物一致性、钩子强度
- 给出PASS/FAIL判断
-
合规审核（由
review-director执行）- 检查敏感内容、平台风险
总复核流程（~review N）
在总复核阶段，增加多Agent分析：
-
风格分析（由
script-writer执行）- 调用
style-analysis-skill - 统计句长、对话比、视觉标记、短句比例、网文感关键词
- 对比爆款剧本集的风格指标
- 输出风格对比报告
- 调用
-
跨集内容重复检查（由
review-director执行）- 检查当前集与前一集是否有重复的场景
- 检查当前集与前一集是否有重复的剧情点
- 如果发现重复，必须 FAIL
-
事件完整性检查（由
review-director执行）- 检查当前集是否是一个完整的事件
- 检查当前集是否有未完成的剧情线
- 检查当前集与下一集的规划是否有逻辑断层
-
对比审核（由
review-director执行）- 调用
comparative-review-skill - 综合风格分析报告
- 给出PASS/FAIL判断
- 提供具体改进建议（引用具体的爆款集）
- 调用
审核清单
业务审核清单
- 节奏控制：3秒进冲突，每30秒有推进
- 冲突密度：每集至少2个冲突点
- 人物一致性：称呼、性格、能力前后统一
- 钩子强度：集尾悬念足够吸引人
- 可拍性：所有内容都可视化
跨集内容重复检查清单
- 当前集与前一集无重复场景
- 当前集与前一集无重复剧情点
- 当前集与前一集无重复对话
- 当前集与前一集的事件是不同的
FAIL 标准：
- 如果发现任何重复内容，必须 FAIL
- 必须指出具体的重复位置
- 必须要求删除或重写重复内容
事件完整性检查清单
- 当前集是一个完整的事件（有开始、发展、结束）
- 当前集没有未完成的剧情线
- 当前集与下一集的规划无逻辑断层
- 当前集的事件流程与分集目录一致
FAIL 标准：
- 如果事件不完整（如只有开始没有结束），必须 FAIL
- 如果有未完成的剧情线，必须 FAIL
- 如果与下一集的规划有逻辑断层，必须 FAIL
输出
PASS或FAIL- FAIL 必须附：位置 + 问题 + 修改动作
../../outputs/review/style-analysis-ep<N>.md../../outputs/review/comparative-review-ep<N>.md
成功标准
- 业务审核：节奏、冲突、人物一致性、钩子强度
- 跨集内容重复检查：无重复场景、无重复剧情点
- 事件完整性检查：事件完整、无未完成剧情线、无逻辑断层
- 总复核：风格维度PASS、整体质量PASS
强制检查
grep -r "�" outputs/{剧本名}/ --include="*.md"grep -r "母亲.*弟弟" outputs/{剧本名}/ --include="*.md"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 95 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A b9d15c97b6cb
script-review-skill is a skill published in the GitHub repository Supreme-Ultimate/novel-to-script-team (163 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 982 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
seedance-copyright
This skill should be used when a Seedance 2.0 prompt mentions named characters, franchises, studios, celebrities, public figures, private people, brand logos, copyrighted scenes, songs, voices, or real-person likeness workflows and needs an IP-safe rewrite.
voice-clone-lab
A consent-controlled tool for creating a reusable synthetic voice from a local speaker recording.
voice-conversion-studio
A voice-conversion tool that changes a provided recording into an authorised target voice.
c2pa-metadata
Embed a C2PA provenance manifest into an AI-generated marketing asset (PNG, JPG, WebP, GIF, TIFF, MP4, MOV, WebM, MP3, WAV, PDF) via scripts/embed-c2pa.py — produces a signed copy of the file carrying IPTC digital-source-type AI claims, an optional c2pa.ai-disclosure assertion for EU AI Act Article 50 (applicable 2…
suede-rights-passport
Suede Labs skill that turns messy creator materials into a local, offline rights-and-provenance transfer package: inventoried and hashed assets, a normalized suede-intake.json manifest, credits and splits, license notes, provenance, and a missing-information report, validated by a bundled stdlib script. Use when a…
suede-rights-audit
Suede Labs skill that finds and organizes the rights gaps in a creator project before packaging: ownership, contributors, splits, samples, licenses, provenance, metadata, licensing readiness, and royalty-routing readiness, each marked confirmed or unknown against an evidence trail. Use when a song, release, or…