Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to susomejias/rembric. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/susomejias/rembric/main/.agents/skills/review-and-ship/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/susomejias/rembricWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/susomejias/rembric/review-and-ship)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/susomejias/rembric/review-and-ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/susomejias/rembric/review-and-ship/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/susomejias/rembric/review-and-ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/susomejias/rembric/review-and-ship.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00312 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
review-and-ship scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review and ship
Trigger
Reviewing changes before shipping. Close key issues, verify behavior, and open or update a PR.
Workflow
- Gather context: diff against base branch, uncommitted changes, recent commits, changed files, and user intent from recent relevant chats if useful.
- Run targeted tests for changed behavior. If no focused tests exist, decide whether to add them or document the gap.
- Review for correctness, regressions, security, and intent fit. Use parallel subagents for larger diffs.
- Fix critical issues before finalizing and re-run affected tests.
- Commit selective files with a concise message.
- Push branch and open or update a PR.
Suggested Checks
git fetch origin main
git diff origin/main...HEAD
git status
gh pr checks --json name,bucket,state,workflow,link
Guardrails
- Prioritize correctness, security, and regressions over style-only comments.
- Keep commits focused and avoid unrelated file changes.
- If pre-commit checks fail, fix the issues rather than bypassing hooks.
- Use
gh pr checksinstead of GitHub Actions-only commands when judging PR readiness.
Output
- Findings summary (critical, warning, note)
- Tests run and outcomes
- PR URL
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 42 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 5c8e88c91e72
review-and-ship is a skill published in the GitHub repository susomejias/rembric (12 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 312 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
review-triage-phase
Produces canonical review actions from fetched review state and renders action markdown. Use when the user wants only triage/action-planning for the review-framework workflow.
create-pr
Create pull requests following Sentry conventions. Use when opening PRs, writing PR descriptions, or preparing changes for review. Follows Sentry's code review guidelines.
codex-review
Professional code review with auto CHANGELOG generation, integrated with Codex AI.
pr
Create a pull request using the Dedalus PR template. Injects git state, commit history, and diff stats automatically.
commit
Scan the session for compound-worthy learnings, then commit the working tree with a repo-appropriate, value-communicating message.