security-review

security-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from sutchan/Agent-Skills-Hub. It costs 79 tokens per session (2,160 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of security-review, MIT.

A code-security review guide that examines how data moves through a codebase and how components interact. It looks for vulnerabilities such as injection flaws, exposed secrets, unsafe dependencies, and access-control mistakes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a file or repository, investigate SQL injection or cross-site scripting, find leaked credentials, check dependencies, or assess authentication and authorization logic.
Why use it?
It can identify security problems that simple searches for suspicious text may miss, including unsafe paths from user input to sensitive operations.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review a file or repository, investigate SQL injection or cross-site scripting, find leaked credentials, check dependencies, or assess authentication and authorization logic.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/security-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add sutchan/Agent-Skills-Hub --skill security-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sutchan/Agent-Skills-Hub

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/security-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/security-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for security-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 79 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,160 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00079 $0.02160
Opus 5.5 $0.00032 $0.00864
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00432
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00216

Measured 3d ago against content hash 8649183a4f62, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to security-review — 8 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/security-review/SKILL.md · 173 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 173 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Security Review

An AI-powered security scanner that reasons about your codebase the way a human security researcher would — tracing data flows, understanding component interactions, and catching vulnerabilities that pattern-matching tools miss.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when the request involves:

  • Scanning a codebase or file for security vulnerabilities
  • Running a security review or vulnerability check
  • Checking for SQL injection, XSS, command injection, or other injection flaws
  • Finding exposed API keys, hardcoded secrets, or credentials in code
  • Auditing dependencies for known CVEs
  • Reviewing authentication, authorization, or access control logic
  • Detecting insecure cryptography or weak randomness
  • Performing a data flow analysis to trace user input to dangerous sinks
  • Any request phrasing like "is my code secure?", "scan this file", or "check my repo for vulnerabilities"
  • Running /security-review or /security-review <path>

How This Skill Works

Unlike traditional static analysis tools that match patterns, this skill:

  1. Reads code like a security researcher — understanding context, intent, and data flow
  2. Traces across files — following how user input moves through your application
  3. Self-verifies findings — re-examines each result to filter false positives
  4. Assigns severity ratings — CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW / INFO
  5. Proposes targeted patches — every finding includes a concrete fix
  6. Requires human approval — nothing is auto-applied; you always review first

Execution Workflow

Follow these steps in order every time:

Step 1 — Scope Resolution

Determine what to scan:

  • If a path was provided (/security-review src/auth/), scan only that scope
  • If no path given, scan the entire project starting from the root
  • Identify the language(s) and framework(s) in use (check package.json, requirements.txt, go.mod, Cargo.toml, pom.xml, Gemfile, composer.json, etc.)
  • Read references/language-patterns.md to load language-specific vulnerability patterns

Read the full file on GitHub · 173 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 173 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A 8649183a4f62

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository sutchan/Agent-Skills-Hub (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 2,160 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to security-review, differing in 8 lines, and is treated as a copy.