Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sutchan/Agent-Skills-Hub --skill wp-abilities-verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sutchan/Agent-Skills-HubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/wp-abilities-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/wp-abilities-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/wp-abilities-verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/wp-abilities-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/wp-abilities-verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.02108 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00843 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00422 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00211 |
Grade A, and why
wp-abilities-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 219 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
WP Abilities Verify
Verify a WordPress plugin's Abilities API registrations. The
centerpiece is the adversarial annotation correctness check: a
readonly: true ability that actually writes (via $wpdb->update,
update_option, a non-GET delegate, etc.) is a security and UX
disaster because agents plan actions on the basis of the annotations
they introspect. This skill catches those lies by reading the callback
body and comparing what it does against what the annotation claims.
The skill also validates audit docs produced by wp-abilities-audit,
checks permission gates and schema hygiene, and optionally executes
each ability against a live environment.
When to use
- After abilities have been registered in a plugin but before a PR lands.
- As a health-check on an already-shipped plugin (catch regressions where a refactor turned a readonly ability into a writing one).
- To validate an audit document before handing it to an implementer.
Two modes
- Static mode — runs from the plugin checkout. No env. Enumerates via source inspection, runs the adversarial correctness check, runs schema and permission lints, and validates audit docs.
- Runtime mode — requires a running env. Does everything static
does PLUS:
wp_get_abilities()for authoritative enumeration, executes each ability with curated inputs, confirms permission roundtrip against real users, and runs a twin-invocation heuristic onidempotent: trueabilities to flag candidates for review (return-value equality is a signal, not a verdict — core defines idempotent as "no additional effect on the environment").
Both modes produce the same structured report format.
A static-mode PASS means "no obvious-shape violations," not "verified
write-free." For high-stakes plugins, run runtime mode before landing
— it catches bootstrap-order, permission-roundtrip, and idempotency
issues that static can't. See references/annotation-correctness.md
for the static blind spots.
Inputs required
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed 88668565f75b
- 16d ago Changed · +1 lines f1ad3fa26eea
- 22d ago First seen · 218 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 99712140e512
wp-abilities-verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository sutchan/Agent-Skills-Hub (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 2,108 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other skills, from other repositories
api-design
Design and review intuitive, scalable, maintainable HTTP APIs. Use this skill whenever the user wants to design a new REST API, review an existing API or spec, write OpenAPI 3.x definitions, or work with HTTP semantics (GET/POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE), status codes, idempotency (Idempotency-Key), error envelopes (RFC 7807…
microservices-patterns
Decompose systems into microservices and apply canonical distributed-systems patterns. Use this skill whenever the user wants to split a monolith into services, design service boundaries, choose between microservices and a modular monolith, implement sagas or the outbox pattern, set up CQRS or event sourcing…
ddd
Domain-Driven Design system for software development. Use when designing new systems with DDD principles, refactoring existing codebases toward DDD, generating code scaffolding (entities, aggregates, repositories, domain events), facilitating Event Storming sessions, creating bounded context maps, or performing code…
feature-workflow
Phased workflow for delivering a Drupal feature or non-trivial change: plan, implement, review, test, finalize. Use when building a new custom module, adding a route/form/plugin, changing entity structure or schema, or any task touching more than a couple of files. Do NOT use for typo fixes, CSS tweaks, or single-line…
drupal-module-development
Use when creating or extending Drupal 11 custom modules, including scaffolding, service architecture, and dependency injection best practices.
php-codeigniter-patterns
Guides CodeIgniter 4 application architecture — Controllers, Models (Query Builder, not an ORM), Entities, the Validation library, Filters (CI4's middleware equivalent), and Services. Use when building a CI4 controller or route, working with a CI4 Model or Entity, wiring a Filter to a route group, or adding a custom…