Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to svnscha/dap-dbgeng. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/svnscha/dap-dbgeng/develop/.claude/skills/dap-request-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/svnscha/dap-dbgengWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/svnscha/dap-dbgeng/dap-request-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/svnscha/dap-dbgeng/dap-request-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/svnscha/dap-dbgeng/dap-request-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/svnscha/dap-dbgeng/dap-request-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/svnscha/dap-dbgeng/dap-request-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01764 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00882 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00353 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00176 |
Grade A, and why
dap-request-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 175 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DAP Request Review
Use this skill when reviewing or tightening the implementation of any DAP request
handler such as launch, attach, initialize, configurationDone, continue,
evaluate, stackTrace, setBreakpoints, pause, next, stepIn, stepOut,
threads, scopes, variables, terminate, or disconnect.
This skill is for implementation quality, not coverage (see dap-request-coverage for
that). The goal is to make each handler easy to audit: parse first, validate required
inputs early, turn arguments into typed values, and only then touch debugger-session
state, server state, or protocol side effects.
Principles
- Parse request arguments first. Do not interleave parsing with session creation, engine calls, thread selection, event emission, or state mutation.
- Validate required inputs before any side effect. If a required argument is missing or malformed, send the protocol error before creating or mutating anything.
- Prefer typed locals or a typed request-specific struct. Do not pass raw
nlohmann::jsonintodap_serverhelpers,debugger_sessionmethods, or engine-facing code - convert to typed values at the top and pass those down. - Use canonical option names. The wire format and the implementation agree on one name
per option (
program,cwd,dbgengPath,stopAtEntry,sources,symbolPath,processId,connectionString,kernel,dumpFile). There are no alias chains or legacy fallbacks in this repo - keep it that way; do not adda ?? breads. - Use the project's
lower_casenaming for locals (astopAtEntryargument reads intostop_at_entry); never carry a JSON spelling that differs from the canonical key. - Keep comments rare but useful: explain why a branch, validation, or ordering constraint exists, not what the code does.
- Make the handler read top-to-bottom as: parse -> validate -> build typed inputs -> perform session/state changes -> send responses/events.
Review Procedure
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 175 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 3c63c0eaf4b5
dap-request-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository svnscha/dap-dbgeng (10 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,764 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.
gsd-ns-review
Route to the appropriate quality / review skill based on the user's intent. gsd-code-review-fix was absorbed by gsd-code-review --fix in #2790.
issue
Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the…
gitnexus
A code-graph analysis add-on for examining an existing codebase, including symbols, call paths, execution flows, and effects across repositories. It can query GitNexus through its command-line or MCP interfaces.
cleanup-code-inspections
Reduce technical debt and improve code quality by systematically resolving static analysis warnings.
superlint
This skill describes the mandatory standard operating procedure for using our internal SuperLint tool. Use this when tasks require fixing code quality issues according to corporate standards.