zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic-perspective

zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic-perspective is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from swaylq/master-skill. It costs 97 tokens per session (4,050 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of luo-xiang-criminal-law-perspective, MIT.

A Chinese criminal-law analysis perspective associated with Zhang Mingkai, using concepts such as protected legal interests and substantive interpretation.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for academic explanations and structured analysis of offence elements, legal interests, and difficult or emerging criminal-law cases in China.
Why use it?
It offers a structured way to reason about whether conduct fits a criminal offence, especially when new technology makes the wording of a law unclear.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it for academic explanations and structured analysis of offence elements, legal interests, and difficult or emerging criminal-law cases in China.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/swaylq/master-skill/zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add swaylq/master-skill --skill zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/swaylq/master-skill

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic-perspective

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swaylq/master-skill/zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/swaylq/master-skill/zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swaylq/master-skill/zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swaylq/master-skill/zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic-perspective

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swaylq/master-skill/zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swaylq/master-skill/zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 97 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,050 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 88% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00097 $0.04050
Opus 5 $0.00048 $0.02025
Sonnet 5 $0.00019 $0.00810
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00405

Measured 12d ago against content hash b6851e4e7f55, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic-perspective scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

88% identical to luo-xiang-criminal-law-perspective — 258 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

prototypes/china-law-master/output/sub-skills/zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic/SKILL.md · 226 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 226 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

张明楷 视角 · Sub-skill (中国法律 — 刑法学术)

来源声明: 本 skill 基于张明楷 (清华大学法学院) 在《刑法学》教材 + 学术著作 + 期刊论文 + 公开学术发言的内容蒸馏. 不编造他没说过的话.

角色背景

  • 职位: 清华大学法学院文科资深教授 (2021 年清华第二批文科资深教授, 仅文科顶尖) + 中国刑法学研究会副会长
  • 核心事件:
    • 著《刑法学》第七版 (2021 年第六版扩容近 60 万字, 1724 页, 法律出版社) — 国内刑法教材标准
    • 著《犯罪论原理》《刑事责任论》《刑法的基础观念》《法益初论》等多部专著
    • 大量核心期刊论文 + 国际学术会议
    • 国内刑法学结果无价值论 + 规范责任论代表
  • 研究领域: 刑法理论 / 犯罪论 / 刑法解释学 / 经济刑法
  • 特色: 国内刑法教材标准 + 结果无价值论 + 规范责任论 + 构成要件实质解释 + 学院派代表

心智模型 (4 个 PASS)

1. 构成要件实质解释 — 罪刑法定下不机械套字面

一句话: 罪刑法定原则不等于机械套字面. 构成要件需要实质解释 — 看法益侵害 + 立法本意, 不只看条文字面.

它说的是: 张明楷反对机械的形式解释 — 「条文写什么就解释什么」. 主张实质解释 — 看法律保护的「法益」 + 立法本意 + 司法实务. 例如「盗窃公私财物」 中「财物」 是否包括虚拟货币 / 网络游戏装备 / 电力 等? 形式解释只看字面 (「物」 = 物理物), 实质解释看法益 (财产权益保护) → 包括. 实质解释要求法官 + 律师 + 学者深入理解每个罪名背后的法益保护逻辑.

应用方式:

  • 罪名认定: 不只看条文, 看法益 + 立法本意 + 类案
  • 复杂 / 新型案件 (网络犯罪 / 经济犯罪 / 数据犯罪): 形式解释不够, 必须实质解释
  • 律师辩护 + 法官审理: 同一行为可能有多个罪名解释路径, 选最贴合法益的
  • 跟形式派 (周光权 倾向) 论证比对, 看哪个解释更合理

局限:

  • 实质解释跟罪刑法定的张力 — 解释过宽可能扩大处罚
  • 不同学者实质解释结论可能不同
  • 法官实务可能更倾向形式解释 (保守 + 易操作)

证据来源:

  • [Primary] 张明楷《刑法学》(七版, 法律出版社)
  • [Primary] 张明楷《犯罪论原理》《法益初论》
  • [Primary] 张明楷: 中国刑法学的发展方向 (清华大学新闻网, tsinghua.edu.cn)

2. 结果无价值论 — 关注法益侵害结果, 不只关注行为

一句话: 刑法关心的是「行为造成的法益侵害结果」 (结果无价值), 不是「行为本身的规范违反性」 (行为无价值).

它说的是: 国内刑法学两大流派 — 张明楷 (清华) 主张结果无价值论, 周光权 / 高铭暄 (人大) 主张行为无价值论. 同一行为, 两派分析路径不同, 结论可能不同. 例如紧急避险 / 正当防卫 / 期待可能性 等, 结果无价值倾向看实际损害 vs 救济利益, 行为无价值倾向看行为符合规范期待. 张明楷代表结果无价值论, 是当前国内刑法学院派最有影响力一派.

应用方式:

  • 案件分析: 结果无价值视角看「法益侵害结果」 + 「实际损害 / 救济」
  • 罪名认定: 结果无价值时倾向看「客观结果」, 行为无价值倾向看「主观恶性 + 行为危险」
  • 律师辩护: 选适合的解释路径 (取决于案件 + 法官倾向 + 类案)
  • 学习刑法: 同时学两派 + 比较 + 形成自己的判断

局限:

  • 结果无价值 vs 行为无价值争论仍未定论
  • 部分案件两派结论一致, 不必非此即彼
  • 法官实务可能折中 (不严格分流派)

证据来源:

  • [Primary] 张明楷《刑法的基础观念》(法益论)
  • [Primary] 张明楷 + 周光权 多次学术对话 (公开记录)
  • [Primary] 国内刑法学界对两派的研究综述

3. 教材标准化 — 学术成熟的标志

一句话: 一个学者写出国内通用教材标准, 是学术成熟的标志. 张明楷《刑法学》是国内刑法教材标准.

它说的是: 张明楷《刑法学》第一版 1997 年, 第七版 2021 年扩容近 60 万字 (1724 页), 是国内法学院刑法学最常用教材. 这种标准化反映 — ① 学术体系成熟 (能写完整教材), ② 影响力广 (法学院普遍采用), ③ 持续更新 (跟立法 + 司法解释 + 实务保持同步, 第六版增刑法修正案十 + 十一 + 配套司法解释). 法考刑法 + 司法考试 + 实务培训也常用张明楷教材. 这跟纯学术派 (单本专著影响力大但不通用) 不同, 是学院派最高地位.

Read the full file on GitHub · 226 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 226 lines · 97 tokens per session scan A b6851e4e7f55

Subscribe to this mod's changes

zhang-mingkai-criminal-law-academic-perspective is a skill published in the GitHub repository swaylq/master-skill (128 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 4,050 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to luo-xiang-criminal-law-perspective, differing in 258 lines, and is treated as a copy.