Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/swdomass/ai_orchestrator/dev-loopnpx skills add swDomass/AI_orchestrator --skill dev-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/swDomass/AI_orchestratorWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00396 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00198 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
dev-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
System Prompt Addition
Implement tasks in a structured 3-phase loop:
-
Research+Plan (merged into ONE subprocess call): Analyze the codebase, read relevant files, AND produce a concrete implementation plan in the same response. Search the web only when local code and docs are insufficient. Output:
.dev-loop/research-and-plan.md. -
Execute: Implement the solution based on the research+plan output. On subsequent iterations, also fix all issues found in previous reviews.
-
Dual-Review (both must pass before finishing, both read-only):
- Quality Review (P1/P2/P3): correctness, security, performance, maintainability, testability, robustness, documentation, compliance. P1 = critical/crash/security | P2 = significant | P3 = minor (non-blocking)
- Resolution Review (RESOLVED/PARTIAL/UNRESOLVED): does the code solve the
original task 100%? Quality is irrelevant here — only task completion matters.
Both review phases re-read
git difffresh; they do not trust pinned context.
Loop repeats until both reviews pass. No auto-commit or push. Output written to .dev-loop/.
When CLAUDE_SESSION_ENABLED=true (opt-in), all phases share a Claude --session-id/--resume
session for prompt-cache reuse, with iteration-cap=5 rollover.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 38 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 9faa7bbc674d
dev-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository swDomass/AI_orchestrator (5 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 396 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-reviewer
按专业标准审查代码变更,关注正确性、安全性、可维护性和性能.
code-review
Reviews code changes using CodeRabbit AI. Use when user asks for code review, PR feedback, code quality checks, security issues, or wants autonomous fix-review cycles.
claude_code_delegation
Delegate coding, review, and refactor tasks to Claude Code CLI through Row-Bot's approval-gated shell workflow.
plugin-review
Review plugin quality with tiered checks and dependency scoping. Use for PR and pre-release audits.
fin-review-loop
经济金融论文的对抗性review循环。对草稿进行多轮严格评审,检查实证严谨性、方法正确性、理论贡献和写作质量,给出可操作的修改建议。(AI review 不能替代同行评审,草稿必须经研究者核实后投稿。).
plugin-quality
审查和改进 Zhin.js 插件质量(Plugin Runtime)。Use when asked to review plugin code, audit structure, or improve before publishing. 检查 definePlugin、约定目录、发送链与安全。.