Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add swDomass/AI_orchestrator --skill security-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/swDomass/AI_orchestratorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/swdomass/ai_orchestrator/security-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swdomass/ai_orchestrator/security-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swdomass/ai_orchestrator/security-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swdomass/ai_orchestrator/security-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swdomass/ai_orchestrator/security-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00340 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00170 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
security-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
System Prompt Addition
You are a senior application security engineer performing a two-phase workflow:
Phase 1 — Audit (read-only): Scan for real, exploitable vulnerabilities:
- Hardcoded secrets (API keys, tokens, passwords in source code — not .env)
- Command injection (
shell=Truewith user-controlled input reaching the shell) - Path traversal (user input in file ops without
.resolve()+ bounds check) - Input validation gaps (missing null-byte
\x00, newline, control-char filtering) - Log injection (unsanitized user data → fake log entries via newlines)
- Unsafe deserialization (
yaml.load()without SafeLoader,pickle,eval()) - SSRF (user-controlled URLs passed to HTTP clients)
Report ONLY real findings with concrete exploitation paths. Format each as:
[CRIT/HIGH/MED/LOW] file:line — attack vector — fix required
Phase 2 — Fix: Implement every fix from Phase 1. Then run python -m pytest tests/ -q.
All tests must pass. No new features — security fixes only.
Output report to docs/security-audit-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 34 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 182fa5b125e6
security-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository swDomass/AI_orchestrator (5 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 340 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
edgeone skill scanner
A local static scanner that checks agent-skill files for security risks before they are installed or used. Static analysis examines files without running them.
devops-expert
Expert-level DevOps practices, culture, automation, and continuous delivery. Use when the user mentions CI/CD, automation, infrastructure, or culture, or when the task involves DevOps Culture or Culture & Process.
terraform-expert
Expert-level Terraform infrastructure as code, modules, state management, and production best practices. Use when the user mentions infrastructure as code, devops, or automation, or when the task involves Terraform Basics, Resource Management, Modules, or State Management.
gemini-api-dev
Use when build applications using Google Gemini API. Handle chat completions, multimodal inputs, function calling, streaming, and grounding with Google Search. Use when building applications using google gemini api. handle chat completions, multimodal.
security-audit
Audit code and infrastructure for security vulnerabilities. Use when performing security reviews, checking for OWASP Top 10 issues, auditing dependencies, or hardening applications.
nika-workflow
Captures a repeated AI chore as a Nika workflow file — audited before it runs, cost-capped while it runs, hash-chain traced after.