canvas-lms-mcp: Skill for Cursor

.cursor/skills/cs-peer-reviewer-trustworthy-ai/SKILL.md

cs-peer-reviewer-trustworthy-ai is a skill for Cursor from sweeden-ttu/canvas-lms-mcp. It costs 68 tokens per session (902 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review and presentation skill for graduate-level computer science work, focused on trustworthy artificial intelligence: making AI fair, private, secure, robust, understandable, and properly governed. It can review papers, proposals, reports, slides, or code and create Reveal.js lectures.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review academic or project work, assess its contribution and evaluation, or build a multi-slide lesson with practical trustworthy-AI examples.
Why use it?
It exposes unclear claims, weak experiments, missing reproducibility details, and risks that a general technical review may overlook.

Skill for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/.

This is sweeden-ttu/canvas-lms-mcp's own configuration. It tells Cursor how to work on canvas-lms-mcp itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything canvas-lms-mcp configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to sweeden-ttu/canvas-lms-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sweeden-ttu/canvas-lms-mcp/main/.cursor/skills/cs-peer-reviewer-trustworthy-ai/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sweeden-ttu/canvas-lms-mcp

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for cs-peer-reviewer-trustworthy-ai

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sweeden-ttu/canvas-lms-mcp/cs-peer-reviewer-trustworthy-ai/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sweeden-ttu/canvas-lms-mcp/cs-peer-reviewer-trustworthy-ai)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sweeden-ttu/canvas-lms-mcp/cs-peer-reviewer-trustworthy-ai"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sweeden-ttu/canvas-lms-mcp/cs-peer-reviewer-trustworthy-ai/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for cs-peer-reviewer-trustworthy-ai

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sweeden-ttu/canvas-lms-mcp/cs-peer-reviewer-trustworthy-ai"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sweeden-ttu/canvas-lms-mcp/cs-peer-reviewer-trustworthy-ai.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 68 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 902 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00068 $0.00902
Opus 5 $0.00034 $0.00451
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00180
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00090

Measured 12d ago against content hash 1bab38027b5c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cs-peer-reviewer-trustworthy-ai scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/skills/cs-peer-reviewer-trustworthy-ai/SKILL.md · 95 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

CS Peer Reviewer + Trustworthy AI Presentation Builder

Provide rigorous, constructive peer review for Computer Science Masters–level work and produce multi-slide Reveal.js presentations that teach Trustworthy AI with concrete, real-world examples.

Inputs to request (if missing)

  • The artifact to review (paper/draft/proposal/slides/code) and its goal
  • Intended venue or rubric (course, thesis proposal, workshop paper)
  • Audience level and time budget (e.g., 15/30/60 minutes)
  • Any constraints (must use Reveal.js, must include Mermaid/KaTeX, etc.)

Peer review workflow (Masters level)

  1. Summarize first

    • 3–6 bullets capturing: problem, method, evaluation, key results/claims.
  2. Assess contribution

    • What is new? What is the baseline? What is the practical impact?
  3. Correctness and clarity

    • Identify ambiguous definitions, missing assumptions, or unjustified steps.
    • Flag diagrams/figures that don’t match the text.
  4. Evaluation rigor

    • Are metrics appropriate? Baselines fair? Ablations present?
    • Reproducibility: datasets, seeds, hyperparameters, compute budget.
  5. Trustworthy AI lens

    • Fairness: group/individual fairness assumptions and trade-offs.
    • Privacy: threat model (membership inference, reconstruction), mitigation.
    • Robustness: distribution shift, adversarial robustness, calibration.
    • Security: prompt injection/model extraction/data poisoning where relevant.
    • Transparency: interpretability, documentation (model cards/datasheets).
    • Accountability: governance, auditing, monitoring, incident response.
  6. Actionable recommendations

    • Provide a prioritized fix list:
      • Must-fix (blocking)
      • Should-fix (strongly recommended)
      • Nice-to-have

Review output format (default)

Return feedback as:

  • Summary
  • Strengths
  • Weaknesses / Risks
  • Questions for the author
  • Concrete improvements (prioritized)
  • Suggested experiments / ablations
  • Trustworthy AI checklist results

Read the full file on GitHub · 95 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 95 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 1bab38027b5c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cs-peer-reviewer-trustworthy-ai is a skill published in the GitHub repository sweeden-ttu/canvas-lms-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 902 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

canvas-cli

Manage Canvas LMS (https://www.instructure.com/canvas) from the terminal with the canvas CLI — courses, assignments, submissions and grading, modules, pages, quizzes, discussions, announcements, users, enrollments, sections, files, and analytics. Use this whenever the user wants to list or create assignments, grade…

jjuanrivvera/canvas-cli · 113 tokens

canvas-admin-roster

Admin skill for walking the Canvas account hierarchy: list accounts and sub-accounts, see courses and users under each, look up which canned reports are available, and enroll or remove users from a specific course — one action at a time. Trigger phrases include "admin roster", "list accounts", "sub accounts", "account…

bruchris/canvas-lms-mcp · 0 tokens

canvas-accessibility-sweep

Educator and learning-designer skill for a pre-launch accessibility and broken-link sweep of a Canvas course. Walks the structural accessibility audit and the link audit over a course's pages, assignments, syllabus, announcements, and (optionally) quizzes, then produces a prioritised remediation list you can work…

bruchris/canvas-lms-mcp · 131 tokens

canvas-office-hours

Educator skill for running office hours through Canvas Scheduler appointment groups. Create and publish sign-up slots for a course, list existing groups and their time slots, and see which students (or student groups) have reserved — one confirmed action at a time. Trigger phrases include "office hours", "appointment…

bruchris/canvas-lms-mcp · 103 tokens

canvas-peer-review-tracker

Educator skill for tracking peer-review assignments in Canvas. Lists who has been asked to review whom, who has submitted versus who is still pending, and lets you assign new reviewers or send reminder messages — one student at a time. Trigger phrases include "peer reviews", "who hasn't done their peer review", "peer…

bruchris/canvas-lms-mcp · 92 tokens

canvas-course-pulse

Educator skill for tracking week-over-week course health trends in Canvas. Surfaces assignment performance trends, login activity, engagement gaps, and struggling students across a longer time horizon than a daily check. Trigger phrases include "course pulse", "course health", "course trends", "week-over-week…

bruchris/canvas-lms-mcp · 90 tokens