Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/swiftfulthinking/swiftfulstarterproject/creating-testnpx skills add SwiftfulThinking/SwiftfulStarterProject --skill creating-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SwiftfulThinking/SwiftfulStarterProjectWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/swiftfulthinking/swiftfulstarterproject/creating-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swiftfulthinking/swiftfulstarterproject/creating-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swiftfulthinking/swiftfulstarterproject/creating-test.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00779 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00390 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
creating-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Creating Test
Scaffold a unit test file using Swift Testing (@Test, #expect, #require) — not XCTest.
Steps
- Identify the class/struct to test (e.g.,
UserManager,HomePresenter) - Determine the test file location (see below)
- Read references/swift-testing-patterns.md for assertion and async patterns
- Create the test file with the template below
- Add test methods for the key behaviors
File Location
Test files mirror the app's folder structure inside the unit test target, with a _Tests suffix:
| App File | Test File |
|---|---|
Managers/User/UserManager.swift |
SwiftfulStarterProjectUnitTests/Managers/User/UserManager_Tests.swift |
Core/Home/HomePresenter.swift |
SwiftfulStarterProjectUnitTests/Core/Home/HomePresenter_Tests.swift |
Managers/ABTest/Services/MockABTestService.swift |
Generally not tested (it's already a mock) |
Create intermediate folders as needed to match the app structure.
Template
import Testing
@testable import SwiftfulStarterProject
struct {ClassName}_Tests {
@Test
@MainActor
func someMethodReturnsExpectedResult() async throws {
// Given
let sut = {ClassName}(service: Mock{ServiceName}Service(), logManager: nil)
// When
let result = await sut.someMethod()
// Then
#expect(result == expected)
}
}
Key Patterns
- Use Swift Testing —
@Test+#expect+#require, NOT XCTest classes - Use structs for test containers, not classes
@testable import SwiftfulStarterProject— gives access to internal types@MainActoron tests that test@MainActortypes (managers, presenters) — do NOT use@MainActoron non-UI tests- Inject mock services — test the manager/presenter in isolation, never use Prod services
- Given/When/Then comments inside each test method — do NOT put these keywords in the method name
- No
testprefix needed — Swift Testing uses@Testmacro instead - Display names —
@Test("Descriptive name")for human-readable failure output #requirefor preconditions — usetry #require(value)to unwrap optionals and halt early instead of force-unwrapping- Parameterize — use
@Test(arguments:)instead of copy-pasting test methods that differ only in input - Method naming: descriptive camelCase (e.g.,
signOutClearsUser,loadDataWithErrorSetsErrorState) - Struct naming:
_Testssuffix (e.g.,UserManager_Tests)
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 74 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 35df6cb89228
creating-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository SwiftfulThinking/SwiftfulStarterProject (74 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 779 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
swift-testing-pro
Writes, reviews, and improves Swift Testing code using modern APIs and best practices. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing projects that use Swift Testing.
swift
Swift development: concurrency patterns, async/await, actors, testing with XCTest and Swift Testing framework.
modernize-tests
Modernize test suites to use modern Swift Testing features or migrate from XCTest.
swift-testing-expert
Expert guidance for Swift Testing: test structure, #expect/#require macros, traits and tags, parameterized tests, test plans, parallel execution, async waiting patterns, and XCTest migration. Use when writing new Swift tests, modernizing XCTest suites, debugging flaky tests, or improving test quality and…
guide-swift-testing
Swift Testing patterns — structs over classes, async confirmations, parameterized tests, exit tests, attachments, common agent mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or migrating Swift Testing code.
swift-testing
WHEN writing, running, or diagnosing Swift Testing suites, including migrating XCTest tests to them and a crashing or non-reporting test target under xcodebuild; NOT for authoring XCTest or XCUITest tests; returns macro-driven test patterns, the XCTest boundary, and the correct way to read xcodebuild results.