Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Swih/mistral-mcp --skill contract-review-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Swih/mistral-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/swih/mistral-mcp/contract-review-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swih/mistral-mcp/contract-review-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swih/mistral-mcp/contract-review-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swih/mistral-mcp/contract-review-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swih/mistral-mcp/contract-review-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00769 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00308 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
contract-review-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 27d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 40 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Contract review workflow
Requires workflow_execute, workflow_status, and related workflow tools in workflows, metier-docs, or admin. They are absent from core. Check mistral://capabilities first. This skill does not create a workflow or supply a contract approval system.
Establish the deployment contract
Read mistral://workflows to identify the requested definition, and call workflow_deployments_list with {} to check deployments and live workers. A catalog entry alone does not prove that the workflow is runnable. If runnable_count is zero, report that a deployment must be started. Confirm which active deployment serves the selected workflow before execution.
Obtain its documented input schema, output meaning, checkpoint query names, decision handlers, and payload shapes from the workflow documentation or owner. The discovery resource lists metadata, not these contracts. Do not invent document fields, review modes, approval handlers, or a standard checkpoint object.
Use only document representations that this deployment accepts. A local document can be converted to text with an available converter; files_upload requires admin and takes file bytes in content_base64, with filename and purpose: "ocr" for a PDF. Its ID is structuredContent.id. A file ID is useful only if the workflow accepts it.
If no suitable deployment exists, explain the requirement. For direct extraction, use the contract-analyzer skill when process_document is exposed; extraction does not provide an approval workflow.
Execute and follow the run
Call workflow_execute with:
workflowIdentifier: the verified workflow name or ID.input: a JSON object matching that workflow's input contract; omit only if no input is required.deploymentName: the verified target deployment when needed.waitForResult: falsefor workflows with human checkpoints.
Check isError and save structuredContent.execution_id. Poll workflow_status with { "executionId": "<returned execution ID>" }. Use spaced, bounded checks and retain the ID so the user can resume tracking.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 27d ago Changed · -85 lines · -24 tokens per session 035aa4fef389
- 1mo ago First seen · 125 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 75dfcfa11920
contract-review-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository Swih/mistral-mcp (15 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 769 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
affiliation-map
A company-affiliation map built from Russian business registry records. It links founders, managers, related companies, registration details, and bankruptcy information.
prepayment-check
A prepayment check for a company or other business partner using its tax identification number. It examines bankruptcy, court cases, licences, registration status, and the person signing the contract.
bulk-campaign
Send a bulk SMS campaign in Turkey — balance check, opt-out filter, İYS consent, delivery report.
check-company
A company-checking workflow for Russian businesses using their tax or registration number. It gathers a brief report, financial statements, bankruptcy records, and court cases.
patent-precheck
Score code for patentability with Patent PreCheck. Use when the user asks "can this be patented?", wants a patentability/novelty/§101/§102/§103 check, or wants to know if an invention or codebase is filing-ready.
kamy
Generate production-ready PDFs (invoices, receipts, contracts, reports, brochures) from Handlebars templates or raw HTML using the Kamy API, and send them for e-signature with optional OTP identity verification, sender-chosen placement, auto-reminders, and a downloadable Certificate of Completion audit trail. Use…