Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/plugin install vbwWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/init)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/init"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/init/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/init"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw/init.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00347 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00139 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
init scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/vbw" init 2>&1 || true
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/vbw" statusline on 2>&1 || true
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/vbw" workflows on 2>&1 || true
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/vbw" interview 2>&1 || true
Write to the user's level, explanation depth and involvement (above; "-": plain words).
Tell the user in a few lines what was set up (from the output above),
including the VBW status line (if it replaced their own status line, say that
vbw statusline off brings theirs back). If project commands were detected,
say they will run only after the user approves them. If VBW needs a git
repository, offer to run git init.
Headless use (claude -p, CI) needs one allow rule per workflow; mention only
if asked: Workflow(vbw:mapping), Workflow(vbw:planning), Workflow(vbw:verifying), Workflow(vbw:researching),
Workflow(vbw:building), Workflow(vbw:fixing), Workflow(vbw:investigating).
Then continue with the vbw:vibe skill, which starts the spec conversation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 27 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A c4de9e1a65f6
init is a skill published in the GitHub repository swt-labs/vibe-better-with-claude-code-vbw (85 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 347 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-22.
Other skills, from other repositories
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
engineer-bot-ops
A workflow for carrying an engineering task from scope through implementation and reviewable delivery. It works with a repository's branch, existing changes, rules, checks, and permissions while separating completed, unverified, and next-step work.
shiplog
Recap of everything shipped since the last run - cross-repo PRs, security fixes, star deltas, and X traction, synthesized into a digest article and a ready-to-post shiplog in your voice.
connect
Choose which wiki this session uses, the team project's pages on the Nimbalyst server or the project's local wiki of files, and connect a repository to its team project. Use at the start of a task before any wiki tool, when a wiki tool returns reponotbound, ambiguousproject, pinmismatch, projectnotaccessible…
llxprt-issue-workflow
Use this skill when asked to address, fix, or work on a GitHub issue in the llxprt-code repository. Covers the complete issue lifecycle - branch setup, gh CLI usage, test-first planning, subagent delegation and review loops, the full verification cycle (including the zai-glm-flash smoke test), open code review (ocr)…
cuga-github-issues
Create GitHub issues for cuga-agent (bugs, features, epics, designs, and related work) against origin using gh, with epic → feature → issue hierarchy and GraphQL sub-issue linking. Use when the user says create new issues, report a bug, file a bug, feature request, new feature, create an epic, GitHub issue, sub-issue…