Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to symphos-ai/orcho-core. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/symphos-ai/orcho-core/main/.agents/skills/orcho-core-quality-gates/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/symphos-ai/orcho-coreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/symphos-ai/orcho-core/orcho-core-quality-gates)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/symphos-ai/orcho-core/orcho-core-quality-gates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/symphos-ai/orcho-core/orcho-core-quality-gates/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/symphos-ai/orcho-core/orcho-core-quality-gates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/symphos-ai/orcho-core/orcho-core-quality-gates.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.00414 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00207 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00083 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
orcho-core-quality-gates scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Orcho Core Quality Gates
Own parser internals and the meaning of review, repair, final acceptance, and halt/resume decisions.
First Reads
orcho-core/AGENTS.mdorcho-core/pipeline/plan_parser.pyorcho-core/pipeline/review_parser.pyorcho-core/pipeline/release_parser.pyorcho-core/pipeline/quality_gates.pyorcho-core/pipeline/control/*when control flow changes- relevant ADR for the gate being changed
Owns
- parser semantics and parser errors
- gate verdict meaning
- review/repair/final acceptance behavior
- halt/resume/operator decision flow
- release approval/rejection semantics
Does Not Own
- public payload shape ->
orcho-core-sdk-wire - prompt contract text ->
orcho-prompt-engine - cross-project orchestration ->
orcho-core-cross-project
Invariants
- Parser output shape changes require tests.
- Review, repair, and final acceptance are distinct contracts.
- A rejected release verdict is not the same as a parser/schema hard halt.
- No low-priority finding should mask a release-tier blocker.
Verification
- targeted parser/gate tests under
orcho-core/tests/unit/pipeline - halt/resume tests when operator flow changes
- SDK/MCP tests when output shape becomes public
Neighbor Skills
orcho-core-sdk-wirefor public parser/gate output shapeorcho-prompt-enginefor gate prompt contract textorcho-core-cross-projectfor cross final acceptance orchestration
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 53 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A d82cafcc7742
orcho-core-quality-gates is a skill published in the GitHub repository symphos-ai/orcho-core (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 414 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-plugin
Use when authoring a new octomux plugin package — package layout, the apply(ctx) export, choosing a registrar, shipping kind presets, testing locally, and confirming with octomux doctor.
review-deep
Drive the deep-review phase of an automated PR review. Consumes the walkthrough, runs the deterministic deep-review workflow (parallel lenses → adversarial validation → code-enforced threshold/caps), drafts the surviving findings, and completes the review run.
review-orchestrator
Drive an automated PR review. Produces a structured walkthrough plus inline draft comments via the octomux review CLI. NEVER posts to GitHub directly — publishing is human-gated.
review-pr
Use when reviewing a pull request, posting PR review comments, or when user says /review-pr. Reviews code with parallel agents and posts a pending GitHub review with inline comments.
review-walkthrough
Drive the walkthrough phase of an automated PR review. Produces a structured walkthrough JSON only — no inline comment drafts. The deep-review agent is attached automatically by the server after this agent finishes.
create-pr
Use when creating a pull request, opening a PR, or pushing and creating a PR for an octomux task.