Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add synaptiai/synapti-marketplace --skill goal-contract-capturegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/synaptiai/synapti-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/goal-contract-capture)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/goal-contract-capture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/goal-contract-capture/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/goal-contract-capture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/goal-contract-capture.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00109 | $0.01486 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.00743 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00297 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00149 |
Grade A, and why
goal-contract-capture scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 47 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Goal Contract Capture
Contract
Iron law: no .flow/goals/<id>.goal.yaml without an evaluator binding, and no contract element invented: every specification element is lifted from the journal or escalated. Invoked by /flow:start (Phase 1, after the Spec Validation Gate), /flow:goal create, and /flow:debug (after the confirmed hypothesis) with a goal id, scope, source, and invocation reason (start | goal-create | review | address | debug). Returns the written goal path plus a goal-created journal artifact; the caller then invokes goal-lifecycle. Permitted skips: review and address invocations skip the specification block (they inherit the issue's capture); goal-create with no linked issue skips the journal artifact. Nothing else may be skipped.
Inputs
- Goal id:
issue-{N},pr-{N}-review,pr-{N}-address, or an ad-hoc slug matching^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]{0,63}$. - Scope:
repo,branch, optionalissue/pr, optionaljournalpath (.decisions/issue-{N}.md). - Source: issue body, PR description, or user-supplied outcome.
- Invocation reason: selects the outcome template and
evaluator.type.
Outputs
.flow/goals/<id>.goal.yaml conforming to plugins/flow/schemas/v1/goal.schema.json, written only through bin/flow-goal-record.sh --create --goal-file <composed.yaml> (atomic, O_NOFOLLOW-defended, schema-validated), plus bin/journal-record.sh --issue {N} --type goal-created --metadata goal_id=<id> --metadata source=<src>.
Workflow
- Pre-flight: if the goal file exists with
lifecycle.statusoutside{cancelled, failed}, stop and raise the six-field escalation (references/escalation-format.md). Never overwrite an active goal. metadata:id,created_at(ISO-8601 UTC),created_by(invoking command),owner(gituser.emailor@me).scope: from inputs; leaverun_idunset (run-state-management fills it).objective:outcomeby reason:start: "Issue #{N} is implemented and verified.";review: "PR #{N} review completed with findings posted or no-finding evidence recorded.";address: "All unresolved findings on PR #{N} are resolved, commented, or escalated.";goal-create: AskUserQuestion;debug: the caller's template. Each AC comes fromcriterion-verification-mapoutput withstatus: pending,evidence_ref: null, and itsverification_commandwhen one exists.specification: lift from the journal's## Specificationsection written byspecification-capture:non_goalsfrom### Non-goals,failure_modesfrom### Failure modes,interface_contractsfrom### Interface contracts, andrisk_mapfrom the### Risk maptable, where each rowArea | Plausible wrong version | Discriminating checkbecomes{area, plausible_wrong_version, discriminating_check}. When the journal has no### Risk map, omit therisk_mapkey. Never invent rows or fill an empty block with placeholders; an empty non-goals, failure-modes, or interface-contracts block is a six-field escalation.constraints:tdd_required,require_all_pass,no_calendar_estimates,no_tier3_without_confirmationalltrue;denied_pathsfromflow.goals.denied_paths;allowed_pathsonly when the goal narrows scope.evaluator:type: flow_verdict_judge(hybridwhen fuzzy criteria exist,deterministicwhen every AC has a command),command: /flow:goal evaluate,judge_agent: goal-evaluator-judge,evidence_bundle_format: plugins/flow/references/evidence-bundle-format.md,denied_context: [implementation_rationale, self_review_findings].continuation:mode: flow_managed,on_incomplete: continue_next_activity,on_blocked: six_field_escalation,on_complete: mark_achieved,max_iterationsfrom settings (default 20).lifecycle:status: active,current_phaseby reason (start: explore,review: fan-out,address: categorize,debug: fix),current_activity,turns_evaluated: 0,last_evaluation: {result: incomplete, reason: "Goal created; evidence not yet collected.", at: <now>}. Neverachievedat creation.- Write, record, verify: run the helper, surface any non-zero exit with its stderr, append the journal artifact, then read the file back and confirm it parses and matches the schema.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · -83 lines · -38 tokens per session deb4713799c3
- 8d ago First seen · 130 lines · 147 tokens per session scan A 591ab5e86ddc
goal-contract-capture is a skill published in the GitHub repository synaptiai/synapti-marketplace (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 109 tokens to every session and 1,486 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
step4-archive-spec
Archive a completed spec — moves it to specs-archived and blocks agent access.
plan-roadmap
Create or update a prioritized product roadmap with phased milestones.
x-dev
A development workflow for completing tasks from a task folder. It follows the task's README and checklist, implements work in dependency order, and records verification evidence.
x-req
A requirements planner that turns a confirmed request into a ready-to-build task package. It assigns a risk level from Q0 to Q3, where higher levels cover changes such as permissions, public interfaces, data migrations, or concurrency.
pocket-closing
Terminal pocket stage. User invokes after pocket-development's phase-level pass writes verdicts. Reconciles reviews against log.json, gates on REVIEWFAIL/REVIEWBLOCKED, advances REVIEW→DONE, runs log close, and emits a closeout summary. Trigger on "pocket-closing", "close the plan", "close out", "finalize plan", or…
product-manager
Use when writing user stories or acceptance criteria, defining product requirements, prioritising a feature backlog, creating a product roadmap, analysing product metrics, facilitating discovery for a new feature, evaluating trade-offs between product directions, or any task that requires deciding what to build and…