synthetic-sciences/openscience is an AI workbench that carries out scientific research by reading papers, forming hypotheses, writing and running code, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and preparing reports. Researchers use it for work in machine learning, biology, physics, and chemistry with remote or local models. Catalogue add-ons extend its scientific workflows through skills and instructions.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/synthetic-sciences/openscience/llamaguardnpx skills add synthetic-sciences/openscience --skill llamaguardgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/synthetic-sciences/openscienceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/synthetic-sciences/openscience/llamaguard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/synthetic-sciences/openscience/llamaguard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/synthetic-sciences/openscience/llamaguard.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.02497 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01248 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00499 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00250 |
Grade A, and why
llamaguard scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/moderate \ This is a copy
91% identical to llamaguard — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 339 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LlamaGuard - AI Content Moderation
Quick start
LlamaGuard is a 7-8B parameter model specialized for content safety classification.
Installation:
pip install transformers torch
# Login to HuggingFace (required)
huggingface-cli login
Basic usage:
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
model_id = "meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id, device_map="auto")
def moderate(chat):
input_ids = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(chat, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
output = model.generate(input_ids=input_ids, max_new_tokens=100)
return tokenizer.decode(output[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
# Check user input
result = moderate([
{"role": "user", "content": "How do I make explosives?"}
])
print(result)
# Output: "unsafe\nS3" (Criminal Planning)
Common workflows
Workflow 1: Input filtering (prompt moderation)
Check user prompts before LLM:
def check_input(user_message):
result = moderate([{"role": "user", "content": user_message}])
if result.startswith("unsafe"):
category = result.split("\n")[1]
return False, category # Blocked
else:
return True, None # Safe
# Example
safe, category = check_input("How do I hack a website?")
if not safe:
print(f"Request blocked: {category}")
# Return error to user
else:
# Send to LLM
response = llm.generate(user_message)
Safety categories:
- S1: Violence & Hate
- S2: Sexual Content
- S3: Guns & Illegal Weapons
- S4: Regulated Substances
- S5: Suicide & Self-Harm
- S6: Criminal Planning
Workflow 2: Output filtering (response moderation)
Check LLM responses before showing to user:
def check_output(user_message, bot_response):
conversation = [
{"role": "user", "content": user_message},
{"role": "assistant", "content": bot_response}
]
result = moderate(conversation)
if result.startswith("unsafe"):
category = result.split("\n")[1]
return False, category
else:
return True, None
# Example
user_msg = "Tell me about harmful substances"
bot_msg = llm.generate(user_msg)
safe, category = check_output(user_msg, bot_msg)
if not safe:
print(f"Response blocked: {category}")
# Return generic response
return "I cannot provide that information."
else:
return bot_msg
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 339 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A c7cda8cdbe9c
llamaguard is a skill published in the GitHub repository synthetic-sciences/openscience (3,473 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 2,497 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 91% identical to llamaguard, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
llamaguard
Meta's 7-8B specialized moderation model for LLM input/output filtering. 6 safety categories - violence/hate, sexual content, weapons, substances, self-harm, criminal planning. 94-95% accuracy. Deploy with vLLM, HuggingFace, Sagemaker. Integrates with NeMo Guardrails.
llamaguard
Meta's 7-8B specialized moderation model for LLM input/output filtering. 6 safety categories - violence/hate, sexual content, weapons, substances, self-harm, criminal planning. 94-95% accuracy. Deploy with vLLM, HuggingFace, Sagemaker. Integrates with NeMo Guardrails.
llamaguard
Meta's 7-8B specialized moderation model for LLM input/output filtering. 6 safety categories - violence/hate, sexual content, weapons, substances, self-harm, criminal planning. 94-95% accuracy. Deploy with vLLM, HuggingFace, Sagemaker. Integrates with NeMo Guardrails.
llamaguard
Meta's 7-8B specialized moderation model for LLM input/output filtering. 6 safety categories - violence/hate, sexual content, weapons, substances, self-harm, criminal planning. 94-95% accuracy. Deploy with vLLM, HuggingFace, Sagemaker. Integrates with NeMo Guardrails.
llamaguard
Meta's 7-8B specialized moderation model for LLM input/output filtering. 6 safety categories - violence/hate, sexual content, weapons, substances, self-harm, criminal planning. 94-95% accuracy. Deploy with vLLM, HuggingFace, Sagemaker. Integrates with NeMo Guardrails.
constitutional-ai
Anthropic's method for training harmless AI through self-improvement. Two-phase approach - supervised learning with self-critique/revision, then RLAIF (RL from AI Feedback). Use for safety alignment, reducing harmful outputs without human labels. Powers Claude's safety system.