agentic-review

agentic-review is a skill for Claude Code from SZoloth/skill-pack. It costs 71 tokens per session (2,079 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review workflow that uses several specialized reviewers and combines their findings. It examines local changes, commits, or differences between branches in a Git repository, where Git tracks code history.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after significant coding work, before a commit, to review staged or unstaged changes, specific commits, or a branch compared with the main branch.
Why use it?
It helps catch security, speed, design, and architecture problems before code is committed or pushed. The combined report organizes findings into actions to take.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution.

Good fit Use it after significant coding work, before a commit, to review staged or unstaged changes, specific commits, or a branch compared with the main branch.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/szoloth/skill-pack/agentic-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add SZoloth/skill-pack --skill agentic-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SZoloth/skill-pack

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for agentic-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/agentic-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/agentic-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/agentic-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/agentic-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for agentic-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/agentic-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/agentic-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 71 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,079 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00071 $0.02079
Opus 5.5 $0.00028 $0.00832
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00416
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00208

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 9b0b4e16c9a1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

agentic-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/agentic-review/SKILL.md · 293 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 293 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Agentic Code Review

Deep, multi-agent code review for personal repos. Analyzes changes, prioritizes files, spawns specialized review agents in parallel, and synthesizes actionable findings.

When to Use

  • After writing significant code, before committing
  • Before pushing a branch
  • Reviewing specific commits
  • Comparing branches (e.g., feature vs main)

Usage

# Review all local changes (staged + unstaged)
skill agentic-review

# Review only staged changes
skill agentic-review --staged

# Review specific commit(s)
skill agentic-review abc123
skill agentic-review abc123..def456

# Review branch diff against main
skill agentic-review --branch feature-branch
skill agentic-review --branch HEAD  # current branch vs main

How It Works

Phase 1: Detect & Gather Changes

First, determine what to review based on arguments:

# Check if we're in a git repo
git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree 2>/dev/null || echo "NOT_GIT_REPO"

# Get current branch
git branch --show-current

# Check for changes
git status --porcelain        # Any local changes?
git diff --stat               # Unstaged changes stats
git diff --cached --stat      # Staged changes stats

Determine review scope from $ARGUMENTS:

Argument What to Review
(empty) All local changes (staged + unstaged)
--staged Only staged changes
abc123 Specific commit
abc123..def456 Commit range
--branch NAME Branch diff vs main/master
--branch HEAD Current branch vs main/master

Phase 2: Pre-Scan & Prioritize Files

Analyze changed files to recommend review order:

# Get changed files with stats
git diff --numstat HEAD~1 2>/dev/null || git diff --numstat

# For each file, assess:
# - Lines changed (more = higher priority)
# - File type (src > test > config > docs)
# - Risk areas (auth, security, data, API)

Prioritization Heuristics:

  1. HIGH: Security-related files (auth, crypto, permissions, secrets)
  2. HIGH: Core business logic (models, services, controllers)
  3. MEDIUM: API endpoints, data access
  4. MEDIUM: Configuration files that affect runtime
  5. LOW: Tests, documentation, styling

Read the full file on GitHub · 293 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 293 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 9b0b4e16c9a1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

agentic-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository SZoloth/skill-pack (14 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 2,079 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

code-review-checklist

Genera un checklist de revisión de código personalizado para cualquier pull request basado en el lenguaje, tipo de cambio y nivel de riesgo. Úsalo cuando te pidan revisar código, verificar un PR, revisar un pull request o generar un checklist de revisión de código. Produce un checklist enfocado con verificaciones…

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · 88 tokens

pr-description-writer

Redacta una descripción de pull request clara y estructurada a partir de un diff de git, resumen de rama o lista de commits. Úsalo cuando te pidan escribir una descripción de PR, redactar una solicitud de cambios o documentar cambios de código. Produce una descripción con resumen, motivación, cambios realizados, pasos…

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · 80 tokens

resolve-pr-comments

Evaluate, fix, answer, and reply to GitHub pull request review comments and conversation comments. Handles both change requests (fix or skip) and reviewer questions (explain using the rationale recalled from past Claude Code transcripts). Use when the user asks to "resolve PR comments", "fix review comments", "address…

tobihagemann/turbo · 96 tokens

review-code

Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps and low-value tests by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Single-concern with a type argument, or full review with no argument. Use when the…

tobihagemann/turbo · 153 tokens

assess-technical-debt

Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, architecture rot, and low-value tests. Ranks findings by impact and refactor effort into a report at .turbo/technical-debt.md. Use when the user asks to "assess technical debt", "find technical debt"…

tobihagemann/turbo · 125 tokens

peer-review

Run an independent peer review via Codex. Use when the user asks to "peer review", "peer review my code", "peer review my plan", "get a second opinion", or "independent review".

tobihagemann/turbo · 46 tokens