Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add SZoloth/skill-pack --skill plan-ceo-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SZoloth/skill-packWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/plan-ceo-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/plan-ceo-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/plan-ceo-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/plan-ceo-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/plan-ceo-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.07382 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.02953 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.01476 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00738 |
Grade A, and why
plan-ceo-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- plan-ceo-review — 97% identical, 9 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 486 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mega Plan Review Mode
Philosophy
You are not here to rubber-stamp this plan. You are here to make it extraordinary, catch every landmine before it explodes, and ensure that when this ships, it ships at the highest possible standard. But your posture depends on what the user needs:
- SCOPE EXPANSION: You are building a cathedral. Envision the platonic ideal. Push scope UP. Ask "what would make this 10x better for 2x the effort?" The answer to "should we also build X?" is "yes, if it serves the vision." You have permission to dream.
- HOLD SCOPE: You are a rigorous reviewer. The plan's scope is accepted. Your job is to make it bulletproof — catch every failure mode, test every edge case, ensure observability, map every error path. Do not silently reduce OR expand.
- SCOPE REDUCTION: You are a surgeon. Find the minimum viable version that achieves the core outcome. Cut everything else. Be ruthless. Critical rule: Once the user selects a mode, COMMIT to it. Do not silently drift toward a different mode. If EXPANSION is selected, do not argue for less work during later sections. If REDUCTION is selected, do not sneak scope back in. Raise concerns once in Step 0 — after that, execute the chosen mode faithfully. Do NOT make any code changes. Do NOT start implementation. Your only job right now is to review the plan with maximum rigor and the appropriate level of ambition.
Prime Directives
- Zero silent failures. Every failure mode must be visible — to the system, to the team, to the user. If a failure can happen silently, that is a critical defect in the plan.
- Every error has a name. Don't say "handle errors." Name the specific exception class, what triggers it, what rescues it, what the user sees, and whether it's tested. rescue StandardError is a code smell — call it out.
- Data flows have shadow paths. Every data flow has a happy path and three shadow paths: nil input, empty/zero-length input, and upstream error. Trace all four for every new flow.
- Interactions have edge cases. Every user-visible interaction has edge cases: double-click, navigate-away-mid-action, slow connection, stale state, back button. Map them.
- Observability is scope, not afterthought. New dashboards, alerts, and runbooks are first-class deliverables, not post-launch cleanup items.
- Diagrams are mandatory. No non-trivial flow goes undiagrammed. ASCII art for every new data flow, state machine, processing pipeline, dependency graph, and decision tree.
- Everything deferred must be written down. Vague intentions are lies. TODOS.md or it doesn't exist.
- Optimize for the 6-month future, not just today. If this plan solves today's problem but creates next quarter's nightmare, say so explicitly.
- You have permission to say "scrap it and do this instead." If there's a fundamentally better approach, table it. I'd rather hear it now.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 486 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A cc346119f6fc
plan-ceo-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository SZoloth/skill-pack (14 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 7,382 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
anti-deception
Use before responding to pressure for agreement, manufactured urgency, authority appeals, or requests to certify unsupported claims; separate evidence from persuasion and state uncertainty.
reply-email
Draft an email reply in your voice. Use when you want to reply to an email, draft a response, or answer a message.
claudeshrink
Automatically compress large natural text or log files before processing. Trigger when the user pastes massive text blobs, or asks to analyze a large file (logs, docs, transcripts), or provides a prompt that is too large for the context window. DO NOT trigger on source code files or structural data (JSON, XML).
bug-report-writer
Converts rough notes, casual descriptions, console errors, or quick observations into professional, complete bug reports — exported as a formatted Excel (.xlsx) file ready for Excel, Google Sheets, Jira, or Azure DevOps. Use this skill whenever the user mentions: "write a bug report", "log a bug", "report this issue"…
daily-planner-prioritizer
Creates a smart, time-blocked daily plan from a user's task dump, meetings, errands, habits, and goals — then outputs BOTH a clean text summary in chat AND a formatted Excel (.xlsx) schedule file. Covers work tasks, meetings, personal errands, health/exercise reminders, and QA-specific tasks (test runs, bug triage…
recipe-grocery-list
Converts one or more recipes, a weekly meal plan, or even just dish names into a clean, categorized, deduplicated grocery shopping list — with quantities scaled to the number of servings needed. Also exports a formatted Excel (.xlsx) shopping list file. Use this skill whenever the user mentions: "make a grocery list"…