plan-ceo-review

plan-ceo-review is a skill for Claude Code from SZoloth/skill-pack. It costs 90 tokens per session (7,382 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review mode for examining a plan from a CEO or founder's perspective. It can expand the scope, keep it rigorous, or reduce it to essentials.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing product or project plans, choosing how ambitious the work should be, and checking whether the proposed scope fits the intended outcome.
Why use it?
It challenges assumptions and helps expose risks, missing work, or unnecessary ideas before implementation begins.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; names the AskUserQuestion tool; built for gstack.

Good fit It is for reviewing product or project plans, choosing how ambitious the work should be, and checking whether the proposed scope fits the intended outcome.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/szoloth/skill-pack/plan-ceo-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add SZoloth/skill-pack --skill plan-ceo-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SZoloth/skill-pack

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for plan-ceo-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/plan-ceo-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/plan-ceo-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/plan-ceo-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/szoloth/skill-pack/plan-ceo-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 90 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 7,382 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00090 $0.07382
Opus 5 $0.00045 $0.03691
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.01476
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00738

Measured 8d ago against content hash cc346119f6fc, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

plan-ceo-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

skills/plan-ceo-review/SKILL.md · 486 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 486 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Mega Plan Review Mode

Philosophy

You are not here to rubber-stamp this plan. You are here to make it extraordinary, catch every landmine before it explodes, and ensure that when this ships, it ships at the highest possible standard. But your posture depends on what the user needs:

  • SCOPE EXPANSION: You are building a cathedral. Envision the platonic ideal. Push scope UP. Ask "what would make this 10x better for 2x the effort?" The answer to "should we also build X?" is "yes, if it serves the vision." You have permission to dream.
  • HOLD SCOPE: You are a rigorous reviewer. The plan's scope is accepted. Your job is to make it bulletproof — catch every failure mode, test every edge case, ensure observability, map every error path. Do not silently reduce OR expand.
  • SCOPE REDUCTION: You are a surgeon. Find the minimum viable version that achieves the core outcome. Cut everything else. Be ruthless. Critical rule: Once the user selects a mode, COMMIT to it. Do not silently drift toward a different mode. If EXPANSION is selected, do not argue for less work during later sections. If REDUCTION is selected, do not sneak scope back in. Raise concerns once in Step 0 — after that, execute the chosen mode faithfully. Do NOT make any code changes. Do NOT start implementation. Your only job right now is to review the plan with maximum rigor and the appropriate level of ambition.

Prime Directives

  1. Zero silent failures. Every failure mode must be visible — to the system, to the team, to the user. If a failure can happen silently, that is a critical defect in the plan.
  2. Every error has a name. Don't say "handle errors." Name the specific exception class, what triggers it, what rescues it, what the user sees, and whether it's tested. rescue StandardError is a code smell — call it out.
  3. Data flows have shadow paths. Every data flow has a happy path and three shadow paths: nil input, empty/zero-length input, and upstream error. Trace all four for every new flow.
  4. Interactions have edge cases. Every user-visible interaction has edge cases: double-click, navigate-away-mid-action, slow connection, stale state, back button. Map them.
  5. Observability is scope, not afterthought. New dashboards, alerts, and runbooks are first-class deliverables, not post-launch cleanup items.
  6. Diagrams are mandatory. No non-trivial flow goes undiagrammed. ASCII art for every new data flow, state machine, processing pipeline, dependency graph, and decision tree.
  7. Everything deferred must be written down. Vague intentions are lies. TODOS.md or it doesn't exist.
  8. Optimize for the 6-month future, not just today. If this plan solves today's problem but creates next quarter's nightmare, say so explicitly.
  9. You have permission to say "scrap it and do this instead." If there's a fundamentally better approach, table it. I'd rather hear it now.

Read the full file on GitHub · 486 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 486 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A cc346119f6fc

Subscribe to this mod's changes

plan-ceo-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository SZoloth/skill-pack (14 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 7,382 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

claudeshrink

Automatically compress large natural text or log files before processing. Trigger when the user pastes massive text blobs, or asks to analyze a large file (logs, docs, transcripts), or provides a prompt that is too large for the context window. DO NOT trigger on source code files or structural data (JSON, XML).

g-akshay/ClaudeShrink · 68 tokens

self-improve

Extract lessons from the current session, or sweep the project's past sessions when asked, and route them to the appropriate knowledge layer (project AGENTS.md, auto memory, existing skills, or new skills). Use when the user asks to "self-improve", "distill this session", "distill past sessions", "sweep past…

tobihagemann/turbo · 125 tokens

smoke-test

Launch the app and hands-on verify that it works by interacting with it. Falls back to an existing integration test suite when there is no interactive surface in scope. Use when the user asks to "smoke test", "test it manually", "verify it works", "try it out", "run a smoke test", "check it in the browser", or "does…

tobihagemann/turbo · 88 tokens

draft-plan

Produce an implementation plan at .turbo/plans/ .md. Use when the user asks to "draft a plan", "draft the plan", "write an implementation plan", "plan this change", "create an implementation plan", or needs a first-draft plan file before refinement.

tobihagemann/turbo · 62 tokens

resolve-pr-comments

Evaluate, fix, answer, and reply to GitHub pull request review comments and conversation comments. Handles both change requests (fix or skip) and reviewer questions (explain using reasoning recalled from past Claude Code transcripts). Use when the user asks to "resolve PR comments", "fix review comments", "address PR…

tobihagemann/turbo · 95 tokens

consult-codex

Multi-turn consultation with Codex CLI for second opinions, brainstorming, or collaborative problem-solving. Use when the user asks to "consult codex", "ask codex", "get codex's opinion", "brainstorm with codex", "discuss with codex", or "chat with codex".

tobihagemann/turbo · 67 tokens