Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add t0ddharris/compound-marketing --skill agent-browsergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/t0ddharris/compound-marketingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/t0ddharris/compound-marketing/agent-browser)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/t0ddharris/compound-marketing/agent-browser"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/t0ddharris/compound-marketing/agent-browser/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/t0ddharris/compound-marketing/agent-browser"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/t0ddharris/compound-marketing/agent-browser.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00215 | $0.00725 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00086 | $0.00290 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00043 | $0.00145 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
agent-browser scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/authentication.md 4.9 KB
- references/commands.md 9.6 KB
- references/profiling.md 3.3 KB
- references/proxy-support.md 4.9 KB
- references/session-management.md 4.2 KB
- references/snapshot-refs.md 4.2 KB
- references/video-recording.md 3.5 KB
- templates/authenticated-session.sh 3.6 KB runs code
- templates/capture-workflow.sh 1.8 KB runs code
- templates/form-automation.sh 1.8 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago Changed · -474 lines · +107 tokens per session d7cc91b3292c
- 1mo ago First seen · 526 lines · 108 tokens per session scan A 81c92a28fb72
agent-browser is a skill published in the GitHub repository t0ddharris/compound-marketing (1 stars, last pushed 16d ago), with no licence file. It adds 215 tokens to every session and 725 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
playwright-cli
Automates browser interactions for testing and validating your own web applications using playwright-cli. Use when you need terminal-first browser control for navigation, form filling, screenshots, tracing, bound browser sessions, debugging, or generating Playwright test code. Only use against applications you own or…
playwright-qa
QA engineering workflows on top of Playwright. Use when a QA engineer asks to design test cases from a ticket, PRD or acceptance criteria, decide what to automate, write a bug report from a failing test or trace, convert manual test cases (TestRail, Xray, CSV) into Playwright specs with case-ID traceability, or review…
browser-agent
Autonomous human-like browser control and professional QA/QC testing. Powered by agent-browser (Rust native CDP, zero Playwright) with ISTQB test matrix generation, automated testcase execution, console/network error tracing, and defect reporting.
browser-task-and-automation-and-delegation
A required procedure for browser actions carried out through a separate browser specialist. Browser actions include opening pages, filling forms, taking snapshots, performance checks, automated tests, and data collection.
website-change-verifier
Verify website changes across source, routes, rendering, metadata, discovery surfaces, and deployment state. Use when a user asks to check a new or edited page, confirm an exact replacement, validate a route, inspect responsive behavior, verify metadata or sitemap changes, compare localhost with production, or…
setup-playwright
Use when adding, extending, or repairing a repo-owned Playwright test harness across Node Playwright Test, Playwright Pytest, or .NET/Java test frameworks. Also use when explicitly persisting @playwright/cli developer tooling, or adding or regenerating Playwright Test Agent definitions for a compatible Node Playwright…