Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add T4LEL/Claude-Arsenal --skill add-aigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/T4LEL/Claude-ArsenalWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/t4lel/claude-arsenal/add-ai)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/t4lel/claude-arsenal/add-ai"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/t4lel/claude-arsenal/add-ai/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/t4lel/claude-arsenal/add-ai"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/t4lel/claude-arsenal/add-ai.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00826 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00413 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00165 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00083 |
Grade A, and why
add-ai scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Add AI
Ship an AI feature that's reliable and affordable, not a demo. Claude is the default model.
Copy this checklist and check off items as you complete them:
Add-AI Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Define the job
- [ ] Step 2: Architecture (simplest tier that works)
- [ ] Step 3: Eval set built BEFORE tuning
- [ ] Step 4: Integrate (server-side, guardrails)
- [ ] Step 5: Verify (mandatory)
- [ ] Report
Step 1 — Define the job
Write down, concretely: input → output, the quality bar (what a failure actually looks like — a wrong extraction field, a hallucinated fact, a tone miss), what this feature explicitly does NOT do, and expected volume per month (requests/day is a guess dressed up as a number — say so if it's unverified).
Step 2 — Architecture
Delegate to the ai-engineer agent with the job definition from Step 1. It picks the simplest tier that can hit the quality bar, in order: single prompt → prompt + tools → RAG → multi-step agent. Never start one tier higher than the job needs.
It also fetches the current Claude model lineup and pricing from Anthropic's official docs — the built-in claude-api skill when available, else WebFetch on docs.anthropic.com; context7 covers SDK/library patterns but doesn't reliably index pricing. Do not price from memory — model names and rates change. Output: model choice with why, cost per single use, and cost per month at the Step 1 volume. Any number not backed by fetched docs is labeled an unverified assumption.
Step 3 — Eval first
Build 10-20 real test cases (real inputs, expected outputs or acceptance criteria) BEFORE writing or tuning any prompt. The eval script lives in the repo (not a notebook, not a one-off chat) and runs on demand — npm run eval or equivalent. Tune the prompt against the eval, not against vibes.
Step 4 — Integrate
Delegate to the ai-engineer agent with the chosen architecture and eval harness:
- API keys server-side only (env vars), never shipped to the client or printed in logs.
- Streaming for any user-facing generation — no spinner-then-wall-of-text.
- Rate limiting and a graceful fallback for API errors/timeouts (cached response, degraded mode, or a clear user-facing message — never a silent hang).
- Prompt-injection guardrails whenever the model reads untrusted content (user uploads, scraped pages, third-party data) or has tool access — treat that content as data, not instructions.
- Token usage logged per request so cost is observable, not discovered at the invoice.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 59 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A e322c16cc800
add-ai is a skill published in the GitHub repository T4LEL/Claude-Arsenal (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 826 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
prompt-engineering
Provides workflows to write, debug, and optimize prompts for LLMs, including few-shot example selection, chain-of-thought structuring, system prompt design, and template composition. Use when the user asks to write or improve a prompt, wants help with few-shot examples, chain-of-thought, system prompts, prompt…
langchain4j-tool-function-calling-patterns
Provides and generates LangChain4j tool and function calling patterns: annotates methods as tools with @Tool, configures tool executors, registers tools with AiServices, validates tool parameters, and handles tool execution errors. Use when building AI agents that call tools, define function specifications, manage…
loom-prompt-engineering
Designs and optimizes prompts for large language models including system prompts, agent signals, and few-shot examples.
metaprompt
Generate a complete, ready-to-use prompt for a target model and harness. Triggers: metaprompt, generate a prompt for, write me a prompt, create a system prompt, prompt engineer this, optimize this prompt.
improve-prompt
Critique and rewrite a prompt using prompt engineering best practices: clarity, examples, XML structure, role, explicit output format, and positive-over-negative instructions. Asks 1-3 targeted questions to fill missing context, then returns a short critique plus a drop-in rewritten prompt. Use when the user wants to…
write-a-prompt
Creates a copy-ready prompt from a rough request, notes, source material, or the current conversation using OpenAI's prompting guidance. Use when the user invokes $write-a-prompt or /write-a-prompt, types a common misspelling such as /write-a-promopt or /wite-a-prompt, asks to "write a prompt for me," asks to turn the…