Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add T4wroot/agentic-seo --skill feedbackgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/T4wroot/agentic-seoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/feedback)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/feedback/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/feedback.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.00645 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00258 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
feedback-page-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to feedback-page-generator — 68 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pages: Feedback / Roadmap
Guides feedback and roadmap pages that collect user input and communicate product direction. Often integrates with Canny, FeatureBase, UserVoice, or similar. Supports product-led growth and community engagement.
When invoking: On first use, if helpful, open with 1–2 sentences on what this skill covers and why it matters, then provide the main output. On subsequent use or when the user asks to skip, go directly to the main output.
Initial Assessment
Check for project context first: If .claude/project-context.md or .cursor/project-context.md exists, read it for product and roadmap priorities.
Identify:
- Tool: Canny, FeatureBase, UserVoice, custom, or embedded form
- Scope: Feedback only, roadmap only, or both
- Primary goal: Collect requests, show transparency, build community
- Audience: Users, prospects, or both
Page Structure
| Section | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Headline | "Share Your Ideas" or "Product Roadmap" |
| Value | We listen; your input shapes the product |
| Feedback | Form or embed; categories (feature, bug, other) |
| Roadmap | In progress, planned, completed; or link to external board |
| Process | How we prioritize; what happens after you submit |
| CTA | Submit idea, vote, view roadmap |
Best Practices
Feedback Collection
- Low friction: Few fields; optional details
- Categories: Feature request, Bug, General
- Duplicate detection: "Similar ideas" to merge votes
Roadmap Display
- Status: In progress, planned, completed
- Transparency: Don't over-promise; "Exploring" vs "Committed"
- Update regularly: Stale roadmap hurts trust
Integration
- Embed: Canny, FeatureBase embed on your domain
- Or link: /feedback → feedback.yourproduct.com
- SEO: Often noindex for external boards; index if on your site
Output Format
- Headline and value proposition
- Page structure (feedback + roadmap sections)
- Process copy (how we use feedback)
- Integration notes (Canny, etc.)
- SEO (index vs noindex)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 68 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A ebc70b7ef492
feedback-page-generator is a skill published in the GitHub repository T4wroot/agentic-seo (15 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 645 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to feedback-page-generator, differing in 68 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
seo
Deterministic LLM-first SEO audits for websites, blog posts, and GitHub repositories. Use this when the user asks to "perform SEO analysis", "run SEO audit", "analyze SEO", "check technical SEO", "review schema", "Core Web Vitals", "E-E-A-T", "hreflang", "GEO", "AEO", or GitHub repository SEO optimization. For…
seo-monitoring
When the user wants to build an SEO data analysis system, monitor indexing/traffic/keywords/backlinks, or set up benchmarks. Also use when the user mentions "SEO data analysis," "SEO monitoring," "article database," "traffic benchmark," "penalty recovery," "SEO work document," "SEO dashboard," "keyword tracking,"…
ai-traffic-tracking
When the user wants to track AI search traffic in GA4 or GSC. Also use when the user mentions "AI traffic," "ChatGPT referral," "Perplexity traffic," "AI Overviews," "GA4 AI sources," "AI search analytics," "track AI referrals," "AI search traffic," "Claude traffic," or "how to track AI traffic." For AI SEO strategy…
traffic-analysis
When the user wants to analyze website traffic sources, attribution, or dark traffic. Also use when the user mentions "traffic sources," "dark traffic," "direct traffic," "UTM parameters," "traffic attribution," "channel attribution," "attribution optimization," "channel analysis," "traffic analysis," "traffic…
analytics-tracking
When the user wants to set up, audit, or optimize analytics tracking (GA4, events, conversions). Also use when the user mentions "Google Analytics," "GA4," "event tracking," "conversions," "attribution model," "gtag," "data layer," "GA4 setup," "conversion tracking," "event setup," "User ID tracking," or "CTA…
directory-submission
When the user wants to submit a product or app to directories, curated lists, launch platforms, or app stores—and needs ready-to-paste copy per platform. Reads project-context.md when present. Also use when the user mentions "directory submission," "get listed," "app store listing," "submit to directories," "curated…