Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add T4wroot/agentic-seo --skill grokipediagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/T4wroot/agentic-seoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/grokipedia)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/grokipedia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/grokipedia/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/grokipedia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/t4wroot/agentic-seo/grokipedia.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.03824 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.01912 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00765 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00382 |
Grade A, and why
grokipedia-recommendations scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to grokipedia-recommendations — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 264 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Platforms: Grokipedia
Guides adding recommendations, links, or content to Grokipedia. Grokipedia is a high-authority platform for parasite SEO and GEO (AI citation visibility). See parasite-seo for parasite SEO strategy. Grokipedia is xAI's AI-generated encyclopedia; ChatGPT, Perplexity, and other AI tools cite it.
On each invocation: On first use in the conversation, output the complete response (Introduction, Importance, Methods, Rules, Avoid, Action). On subsequent use or when the user asks to skip (e.g., "just do it", "skip intro", "I already know"), go directly to Action.
Growth channel value: Grokipedia is worth investing in as a growth channel for GEO and backlinks. It is positioned as a potential future Wikipedia—Wikipedia's traffic and domain authority are well-established; Grokipedia, though newer, is already being cited by major AI products and its citation share is rising.
Scope
- Suggest Article: Request new topics; Grok AI reviews and may create
- Suggest Edit: Propose corrections or additions to existing articles
- Report Error: Flag factual inaccuracies, outdated info, citation errors
- Parasite SEO / GEO: Use Grokipedia's authority for backlinks and AI citation (see parasite-seo for strategy)
What Is Grokipedia
- Platform: AI-generated online encyclopedia by xAI (Grok); launched October 2025
- Content: ~6M+ articles; AI-generated, fact-checked by Grok; users cannot edit directly
- GEO relevance: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Gemini, Copilot cite Grokipedia for factual queries
- Parasite SEO: High-authority domain; links from Grokipedia pass authority; content placement for distributed visibility (see parasite-seo)
Why It Matters (Citation Data)
| Metric | Note |
|---|---|
| ChatGPT citations | ~263K responses cited Grokipedia from 13.6M prompts; ~95K individual pages. Wikipedia: 2.9M responses—quite a way off, but impressive for how new they are. (Source: SEO tools, Jan 2026) |
| Citation share trend | ~0.01–0.02% of ChatGPT citations/day; steadily increasing since mid-Nov 2025 |
| AI product adoption | Spike in Google AI (Gemini, AI Overviews, AI Mode) and Copilot in Dec 2025; ChatGPT cites Grokipedia most |
| Use case | Niche, obscure, highly specific factual queries; ChatGPT often features Grokipedia as one of the first sources cited |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 264 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 60cc6c9ca056
grokipedia-recommendations is a skill published in the GitHub repository T4wroot/agentic-seo (15 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 3,824 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to grokipedia-recommendations, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
fire-your-seo-agency
A procedure for improving how a website appears in search engines and how AI answer systems find and cite it. It covers search, answer-engine, generative-AI, and Naver visibility.
content-thicken
Evidence-driven blog driver. Takes ONE target from the fused search plus AI-answer content library, pulls the real questions it has to answer, drafts a thick long-form guide against a template contract, validates it deterministically, and stops at preview. Two modes, thicken an already-earning post IN PLACE (never…
backlink-outreach
Find, evaluate, pitch and track natural backlink and content partnerships. Prospects come from the GEO citation data rather than a generic blog search: the targets are the pages an AI already cites when answering your category questions. Research runs on the Monid tool layer (web search and scrape, authority metrics…
geo-monitor
Run and read the GEO pipeline, which measures whether AI answer engines mention, recommend and cite your site. Puts a fixed registry of real user questions to an answer engine through the Monid tool layer, detects the three signals plus competitors, and turns "a rival is named and we are not" into a tracked work…
seo-intake
Run and read the SEO intake pipeline. Pulls the organic keyword set for your domain and for each competitor through the Monid tool layer, computes the gap locally, and routes every keyword to the one action that can help it (write-new / striking / build-depth / defend / noise). Use when asked to refresh the SEO queue…
bing-duplicate-content-fix
Audit article groups, WordPress categories, or supplied URLs for copied content, near-duplicate templates, search-intent overlap, and keyword cannibalization; prepare exact SEO/AEO/GEO fixes; apply only approved WordPress changes; verify saved and public results; and request a Bing recrawl when authorized. Use for…