Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tae0y/python-project-template --skill tddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tae0y/python-project-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tae0y/python-project-template/tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tae0y/python-project-template/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tae0y/python-project-template/tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tae0y/python-project-template/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tae0y/python-project-template/tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01647 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00659 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00329 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00165 |
Grade A, and why
tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 248 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 9d11cbdb354b
tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository tae0y/python-project-template (14 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,647 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
tdd-workflow
Drive implementation through a test-first loop: write a failing test, make it pass with the simplest change, then refactor under a green suite. Use when the user asks for TDD or test-driven development, wants tests written before the code, is adding behaviour to code that has tests, is fixing a bug and wants a…
test-writing
Writes meaningful tests that actually catch bugs.
absolute-work
End-to-end, phase-gated SDLC for AI coding agents: relentless design interview → reviewed spec → dependency-graphed task board → safe-wave TDD execution → verification → converge. Handles features, bugs, refactors, greenfield projects, planning breakdowns, and migrations. Triggers on "absolute work", "build this…
tdd
Drive a change through a red-green-refactor loop - failing test first, minimal code to pass, then clean up. Use when implementing a feature or fixing a bug where correctness matters and a test can pin the behavior. Says "TDD", "test first", "red green refactor", "write the test first".
tdd
You MUST use this when implementing testable behavior changes - new features, bug fixes, or refactors with observable contracts. Covers writing meaningful failing tests before implementation and verifying behavior through the red-green-refactor cycle. Not for purely mechanical edits without behavior changes.
agent-whole-qa
A coordinator for testing an entire application and sending failures to separate development and testing agents. It repeats repair and regression rounds rather than writing code or tests itself.