Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add taivop/marketplace --skill court-proceedings-datagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/taivop/marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/taivop/marketplace/court-proceedings-data)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/taivop/marketplace/court-proceedings-data"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/taivop/marketplace/court-proceedings-data/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/taivop/marketplace/court-proceedings-data"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/taivop/marketplace/court-proceedings-data.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00665 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00332 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00133 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
court-proceedings-data scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 54 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Court Decisions and Hearings
Access
- Search UI:
https://www.riigiteataja.ee/et/otsing/kohtulahendid - API base:
https://www.riigiteataja.ee/public-api/api/v1 - Public JSON POST endpoints; no login is required.
Retrieve
Post JSON to /kohtuteave/otsing/kohtulahendid for decisions. A minimal request is:
{
"general": {
"searchInText": false,
"searchInTitle": false,
"searchText": "",
"searchText2": "",
"logicalOperator": "AND",
"morphSearch": false,
"sort": "toiminguNr",
"sortAscending": false
},
"precise": {"kohus": [], "seaduseSatted": {}}
}
Post the same general object to /kohtuteave/otsing/kohtuistungid with precise: {"kohus": []} for hearings. Useful precise decision fields include lahendiKpAlgus, lahendiKpLopp, kohtunik, ecliNr, menetluseTyyp, menetlusliigid, kohtumenetluseLiik, and kohus. Hearing fields include istungiAegAlgus, istungiAegLopp, istungiLiik, istungiSaal, kohtunik, menetluseLiik, and kohus.
Both responses contain kokku and up to 30 tulemused. Narrow the query with dates or court filters; do not treat the first response as a bulk export. A decision's public file is GET /kohtuteave/kohtulahendid/{avalikustatudFailiId}/file.
Return
- Decisions: preserve
objektId, case number, ECLI when present, court, decision date, proceeding type, status, public-file ID/name, annotations, and source URL. - Hearings: preserve case number, court, judge, hearing time/type/room, status, title, query, and retrieval time.
- Do not infer an outcome from a hearing listing or an annotation.
Limits
- Publicity restrictions and redactions apply; this is not access to complete case files.
- The result API returns 30 rows at a time and exposes no documented bulk pagination contract. Use focused searches.
- Historical URLs ending in
koik_menetlused.htmlandkohtuistungid_otsing.htmlnow load the same JavaScript application; they are not data endpoints.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 54 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A eacacc597876
court-proceedings-data is a skill published in the GitHub repository taivop/marketplace (17 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 665 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…