Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add taivop/marketplace --skill mfa-sanctionsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/taivop/marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/taivop/marketplace/mfa-sanctions)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/taivop/marketplace/mfa-sanctions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/taivop/marketplace/mfa-sanctions/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/taivop/marketplace/mfa-sanctions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/taivop/marketplace/mfa-sanctions.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00402 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00201 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00080 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
mfa-sanctions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
MFA Sanctions
Use when
- You need Estonia-specific sanctions regulations or the MFA's official regime-specific subject-list routes.
Avoid when
- You need only EU or UN consolidated sanctions lists without Estonia-specific implementation context.
Endpoint
- MFA index: https://www.vm.ee/en/activity/international-sanctions/sanctions-government-republic-estonia
Workflow
- Parse anchors in the main content area.
- Keep direct
riigiteataja.ee/akt/regulation links and MFA links whose labels identify a subject list. - Resolve relative MFA links against the index URL and preserve the anchor label as the regime/list title.
- Fetch Riigi Teataja records with the legal-acts recipe when full text or validity metadata is needed.
Access reality
- Public server-rendered HTML, verified 2026-07-14.
- No working public data API is documented. The portal's configured backend returns
nullwithout undocumented context and is intentionally not part of this recipe.
Output schema expectations
- Keep
source_type(regulationorsubject_list),source_url,regime,record_title, andretrieved_at.
Limits and caveats
- Sanctions content changes frequently; always capture retrieval date.
- Linked subject-list pages are JavaScript-backed and may render no rows to a raw client. Do not claim a complete person/entity list unless rows were actually returned.
- The MFA page is an Estonia-specific index, not a substitute for the EU sanctions map or consolidated EU/UN lists.
Verification hooks
- Require HTML plus at least one direct Riigi Teataja act link and one MFA subject-list link.
- Cite the regulation URL for legal claims and state explicitly when a linked subject list could not be enumerated.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 38 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A ab15553201d7
mfa-sanctions is a skill published in the GitHub repository taivop/marketplace (17 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 402 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…