Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/takeoff69/codex-skills-kit/gate-engineeringnpx skills add TAKEOFF69/codex-skills-kit --skill gate-engineeringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TAKEOFF69/codex-skills-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00080 | $0.00926 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00040 | $0.00463 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
gate-engineering scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Gate Engineering
Build standing quality nets that prove they detect intended defect class.
Scope
This skill applies to persistent repository gates: lint rules, CI checks, tripwires, contract suites, corpus detectors, and golden tests. Ordinary unit tests written with a feature do not each need full gate ceremony.
Core rule
A gate never observed failing is unproven. Ship known-bad input, known-good twin, and repeatable way to prove catch.
Five laws
- Prove red, then green. Seed representative defect and observe non-zero failure. Fix it and observe pass. Preserve both fixtures and expose
--selftestor equivalent deterministic command. - Fix classes, not instances. Recurrence turns one reported case into corpus problem. Detect class, scan full owned corpus, fix all findings, then keep detector as gate.
- Keep fixtures hermetic. Commit inputs. Avoid live database, mutable cache, network, current date, or content SHA dependencies unless gate explicitly tests those boundaries.
- Assert contract, not incidental snapshot. Prefer invariant such as presence, range, mapping, ordering, or semantic label. Byte-exact and pixel-exact snapshots need clear reason and controlled update process.
- Audit consumers. Producer validation does not protect cached, read, import, or alternate write paths. Enumerate bypasses and gate contract where consumers can violate it.
Assertion traps
- Assert presence before uniqueness – zero matches are trivially unique.
- Assert selection is non-empty before
all(...)or universal validity. - Ensure failure fixture reaches code path under test rather than being filtered earlier.
- Include near-miss good fixture so detector does not encode broad false positives.
- Test disabled or feature-flagged path by toggling it in controlled run.
Gate lifecycle
- Recalibrate baseline after legitimate behavior change; do not weaken invariant to make CI green.
- Re-enable disabled gate only after current corpus passes it.
- Refresh tripwire baseline with producer or consumer refresh that changes expected truth.
- Match gate cadence to data cadence.
- Version fixture schema when parser or contract changes.
- Record scoped skip with owner and expiry; never silently disable.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 94 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 5709917f1773
gate-engineering is a skill published in the GitHub repository TAKEOFF69/codex-skills-kit (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 926 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
hooksmith
Use when designing or reviewing safe Grok Build hooks for linting, tests, formatting, notifications, command guards, lifecycle automation, or project hook trust decisions.
manage-codex-skills
Inventory, classify, route, catalog, relocate, or validate Codex skills and generate a skills menu. Use for skill-library organization or when Codex must find task-relevant skills. Classification, relocation, creation, revision, and promotion require user approval.
reflect-codex-workflows
Compare evidence from a current or completed project with installed skills and decide whether to reuse, revise, create, or not skill the lesson. Use for workflow reflection or proposed skill upgrades. Do not edit skills without explicit authorization.
bootstrap-codex-workspace
Inspect a Windows or macOS Codex environment and produce a read-only, approval-bound plan for the global AGENTS.md path, user skills root, and root for future projects. Use for workspace setup, bootstrap, or location planning. Do not write outside the repository until the user approves the exact plan ID.
maintain-project-ai-records
Initialize and maintain lightweight AI work records in a writable project. Use on the first substantive writable task and after meaningful milestones. Do not create records for read-only inspection or trivial answers.
organize-codex-projects
Choose a location and internal structure for a future Codex project, including focused projects and umbrella projects with durable subprojects. Use when creating or planning a new project. Do not move, rename, or normalize existing projects.