Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Taketo-Yoda/uv-sbom. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Taketo-Yoda/uv-sbom/develop/.claude/skills/sync-config/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Taketo-Yoda/uv-sbomWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/taketo-yoda/uv-sbom/sync-config)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/taketo-yoda/uv-sbom/sync-config"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/taketo-yoda/uv-sbom/sync-config/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/taketo-yoda/uv-sbom/sync-config"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/taketo-yoda/uv-sbom/sync-config.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.01217 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00609 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00243 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00122 |
Grade A, and why
sync-config scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 156 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/sync-config - CLI-Config Sync Skill
Audits src/cli.rs against src/config.rs and src/main.rs to detect CLI options that are not exposed through the config file layer, and guides fixing any gaps found.
Trigger Examples
/sync-config- "Check that all CLI options are reflected in the config file"
- "Verify CLI options are synced with config"
Background: The Five-Location Rule
Every CLI option intended to be user-configurable must appear in five places:
| Location | What to add |
|---|---|
src/config.rs — ConfigFile struct |
pub <field>: Option<T> |
src/config.rs — CONFIG_TEMPLATE |
Commented-out YAML entry with description |
src/main.rs — MergedConfig struct |
<field>: T |
src/main.rs — merge_config() |
CLI > config > default priority logic |
src/main.rs — request builder |
Pass merged value to SbomRequest |
Reference Implementation: check_cve
Use check_cve as the canonical pattern when adding a new boolean flag:
src/config.rs — ConfigFile:
pub check_cve: Option<bool>,
src/config.rs — CONFIG_TEMPLATE:
# Enable CVE vulnerability checking
# check_cve: false
src/main.rs — MergedConfig:
check_cve: bool,
src/main.rs — merge_config():
// check_cve: CLI flag || config value
let check_cve = args.check_cve || config.check_cve.unwrap_or(false);
src/main.rs — request builder:
.check_cve(merged.check_cve)
Workflow
Step 1: Audit — Extract CLI Options
Read src/cli.rs and list all pub fields in the Args struct.
Exclude from audit (infrastructure, not user-configurable features):
config(-c/--config) — selects the config file itselfinit(--init) — generates the config templatepath(-p) — project pathoutput(-o) — output file path
Step 2: Audit — Check ConfigFile Coverage
Read src/config.rs and list all fields in the ConfigFile struct (excluding unknown_fields).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 156 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A f7cc9c711517
sync-config is a skill published in the GitHub repository Taketo-Yoda/uv-sbom (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,217 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
remember
Review the current conversation and capture valuable knowledge — best practices, coding conventions, architecture decisions, workflows, and user feedback — into persistent memory (AGENTS.md) or reusable skills. Use when the user says: (1) remember this, (2) save what we learned, (3) update memory, (4) capture…
code-review
Perform a structured code review of changes, checking for correctness, style, tests, and potential issues.
red-team-review
Unified adversarial review: v4.3 Strategic Matrix (MTA-004). 7-phase framework: Priors → Rubric → Adversarial Lenses → SWOT/TOWS → MCDA Decision Engine → Blind Spot/Kill Switch → Executive Summary. Absorbs: bias-detector.
decision-journal
Unified decision lifecycle: Pre-decision logging, post-decision review, failure classification, and calibration tracking. Absorbs: post-mortem-engine.
Smart Code Review
Review a PR diff: triage its severity, then produce a depth-appropriate review with structured findings, fix suggestions, and a merge decision. Use for code review, review PR, and severity triage requests.
architecture-review
Analyze Python module architecture using pyscn - class coupling (CBO), cohesion (LCOM), dependency cycles, and module communities. Use when user asks about architecture, module structure, coupling, circular dependencies, or which files to review or change together.