Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/talayash/agentrium/security-reviewnpx skills add talayash/agentrium --skill security-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/talayash/agentriumWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/talayash/agentrium/security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/talayash/agentrium/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/talayash/agentrium/security-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00232 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00116 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00046 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
security-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Security Review Skill
Threat Surface for ClaudeTerminal
- PTY Command Injection - user input → xterm.js → IPC → PTY
- IPC Boundary - frontend can invoke any registered command
- Process Spawning -
cmd /Cwrapping needs proper escaping - File System - workspace paths from user input
- Auto-updater - must verify signed releases
- SQLite - parameterized queries only
Quick Checklist
- No
.unwrap()in production Rust paths - No hardcoded secrets/tokens/passwords
- No
eval(),innerHTML,dangerouslySetInnerHTML - All IPC commands validate inputs
-
cmd /Ccalls escape user strings - SQLite uses parameterized queries
- Tauri capabilities are minimal
- CSP configured in tauri.conf.json
- Auto-updater verifies signatures
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 28 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A d45ddc8a97f0
security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository talayash/agentrium (39 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 232 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
wechat-article-writer
公众号/自媒体全流程。根据用户表述自动匹配：撰写文章、封面图、正文插图、风格提取。支持多种写作风格。当用户提到写公众号、技术博客、公众号封面、正文插图、步骤图、演示图、流程示意、分析写作风格、克隆文风、模仿爆款、提取风格时使用。详见 reference 目录。.
pre-landing-review
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when explicitly asked for the specialized pre-landing workflow. Product /review requests are handled by BitFun's unified Review mechanism instead.…
vibe-research
Deep research and market validation for app ideas. Use when starting a new project, validating an idea, or when the user says "research my idea", "validate my app", or "help me start a new project".
commit-push-pr
Commit selected local changes, push the branch, and create or update a GitHub pull request with BitFun attribution. Use when the user asks to 提交 PR、提代码、commit and push、开 PR、create a pull request, or wants a Claude Code-like one-command PR publishing flow from BitFun.
investigate
Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT debug…
pr-review-canvas
Create a BitFun Canvas for reviewing a pull request, branch diff, or change set with Cursor-style diff cards, review maps, risk callouts, and focused reviewer flow. Use when the user asks for a PR review canvas, diff walkthrough, change-set overview, or visual review summary.