Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/talont-org/autoskillit/chart-coursenpx skills add TalonT-Org/AutoSkillit --skill chart-coursegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TalonT-Org/AutoSkillitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/talont-org/autoskillit/chart-course)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/talont-org/autoskillit/chart-course"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/talont-org/autoskillit/chart-course.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00045 | $0.04370 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.02185 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00874 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00437 |
Grade A, and why
chart-course scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 521 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Chart Course — Interactive Strategic Compass Builder
When to Use
- Starting a new project phase and mapping all possible directions
- Project has grown enough that strategic coherence needs explicit tracking
- Understanding how near-term work relates to long-term options
- Updating an existing compass after significant project changes
- Preparing for a planning session and need a current landscape assessment
This is an interactive skill. The user provides vision and priorities; the skill provides codebase analysis, external research, and visualization. The compass is built collaboratively through conversation, not generated autonomously.
Arguments
/chart-course {focus_or_question} [compass_path=<path>]
{focus_or_question}— Required. A broad strategic question or focus area. Examples: "Map all possible directions for the research platform", "What are our options for distributed compute?", "Where should we invest for compliance readiness?"compass_path=<path>— Optional. Path to an existing compass document. When provided, the skill loads the existing compass as the starting point and the conversation focuses on updating, adding, or retiring directions.
GitHub Issue Detection
Scan ARGUMENTS for GitHub issue references (full URL, owner/repo#N, bare #N).
If detected, call fetch_github_issue(issue_url, include_comments: true) and
incorporate the issue content as additional strategic context.
Critical Constraints
NEVER:
- Modify any source code files — this is a read-only analysis skill
- Create files outside
{{AUTOSKILLIT_TEMP}}/chart-course/ - Dismiss directions the user raises — every direction gets honest assessment
- Use implementation difficulty as a reason to exclude a direction
- Include cost estimates or timelines — map what IS, not what it costs
- Skip diagrams — progressive visualization is the core value of this skill
- Generate the compass document without user review and approval
- Write the final compass to disk until the user confirms (plan-apply pattern)
- Proceed past a checkpoint without user response
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 521 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 9e5f9f16d6f6
chart-course is a skill published in the GitHub repository TalonT-Org/AutoSkillit (5 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 4,370 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ce-compound
Document a solved problem as a durable repo learning. Use when verified work produced non-obvious reasoning absent from its final code, tests, or existing docs; avoid routine fixes whose artifacts already explain the lesson.
pptx-import
会话里有上传的 .pptx，且用户要把这份幻灯片填进一节已建的课（先 createstage 建课，再 importpptx 把页面追加进这节课堂，保留原版排版；课堂标题以 createstage 为准，PPT 不接管）。随后逐页检查（有 renderscenepreview 就渲染看）并修 bad case，理解整课之后才写旁白/spotlight，最后 TTS。仅在用户要求时插入 quiz 或 interactive。不要重新规划整课。.
learn-everything
Turn an uploaded PDF, paper, book chapter, document, URL, or user-provided topic into a structured, interactive learning course. Use when the user wants to learn, study, understand, master, review, or practice a subject chapter by chapter; asks for a tutorial or curriculum from source material; wants exercises…
office-pptx
Use when the user asks to create, inspect, verify, polish, or deliver PowerPoint .pptx decks, Google Slides-targeted deck artifacts, strategy narratives, operating reviews, pitch decks, teaching decks, section slides, bullet slides, or source-to-PPTX transformations.
readme-critique
High-judgment whole-document review for shape, pedagogy, and design-rationale. Catches the catalog-vs-teaching, composition-vs-enumeration, running-domain-vs-ad-hoc failure modes that readme-verify's gates pass on. Runs between draft and verify.
read-book
When you want to read and extract structured notes from a book — PDF, EPUB, MOBI, markdown, .txt, pasted text, or URL to a public-domain work. Reads in chunks (by chapter when a TOC exists, by 50-page blocks otherwise), extracts per-chapter TL;DR + key concepts + quotes + action items + frameworks, and offers to…