Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to TalonT-Org/AutoSkillit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TalonT-Org/AutoSkillit/main/.claude/skills/verify-diag/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TalonT-Org/AutoSkillitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/talont-org/autoskillit/verify-diag)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/talont-org/autoskillit/verify-diag"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/talont-org/autoskillit/verify-diag.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01806 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00903 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00361 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00181 |
Grade A, and why
verify-diag scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 204 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify Diagram Skill
Verify an architecture diagram's factual accuracy against the actual codebase. Adapted from the dry-walkthrough methodology for diagram validation.
When to Use
- After generating an arch lens diagram
- User says "verify diagram", "verify diag", "check diagram"
- Before finalizing diagram examples or documentation
Critical Constraints
NEVER:
- Modify source code files
- Modify the diagram during verification (report findings only)
ALWAYS:
- Verify every named component exists in the codebase
- Trace actual code paths for every connection
- Determine read/write directionality for every connection
- Report findings to terminal, not to files
Verification Workflow
Step 0: Validate Mermaid Syntax (Rendering Check)
This step runs BEFORE semantic verification. Extract every mermaid code block and check for syntax errors that would prevent rendering.
For each ```mermaid block, validate:
1. Node label quoting:
[...]node content must NOT contain unescaped double quotes- BAD:
A["value = "hello""]— inner quotes break the parser - GOOD:
A["value = hello"]orA[value = hello] - Check: scan all
[...]and(...)node definitions for"inside content
2. Bracket balance:
- Every
[has a matching]on the same line (for node definitions) - Every
(has a matching)on the same line - Exception:
([...])stadium shapes have nested brackets — count outer pair
3. Special characters in node labels:
- Parentheses
()inside[...]labels break parsing — rephrase or remove - Pipe
|inside node labels conflicts with edge label syntax - Curly braces
{}inside node labels conflict with rhombus/decision syntax - Hash
#at start of label can be misinterpreted
4. Edge label syntax:
- Edge labels must use
-->|"label"|or-->|label|format - Unmatched pipe chars on edge lines break parsing
5. Subgraph naming:
subgraph NAME ["Display Title"]— the["..."]is valid mermaid syntax- But
subgraph NAME [Display Title]without quotes is NOT valid if title has spaces
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 204 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A bc93d784c16f
verify-diag is a skill published in the GitHub repository TalonT-Org/AutoSkillit (5 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,806 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…