Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tao12345666333/ankaloop --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tao12345666333/ankaloopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tao12345666333/ankaloop/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tao12345666333/ankaloop/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tao12345666333/ankaloop/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tao12345666333/ankaloop/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tao12345666333/ankaloop/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00203 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00102 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Skill
When reviewing code, follow these best practices:
Review Checklist
- Correctness: Does the code work as intended?
- Readability: Is the code easy to understand?
- Performance: Are there any obvious performance issues?
- Security: Are there any security vulnerabilities?
- Testing: Is the code adequately tested?
- Documentation: Is the code well-documented?
Review Guidelines
- Be constructive and kind
- Focus on the code, not the coder
- Suggest improvements, don't just criticize
- Explain the "why" behind your suggestions
- Prioritize issues by severity
Common Issues to Look For
- Magic numbers and strings
- Duplicated code
- Long functions or methods
- Deep nesting
- Missing error handling
- Hardcoded values
- Poor naming conventions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 33 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 207ea07fed42
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository tao12345666333/ankaloop (48 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 203 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review
Review a change for correctness, security, and missing tests.
cw-slice
Use before writing code for any Codewhale feature, upgrade, or refactor: find the existing owner of the behavior, bound the change to one reviewable slice, and fix the evidence bar before you start.
gh-compile-issues
Triage N GitHub issues into a coverage matrix: fetch each, check current code, classify already-done/quick-fix/design/defer with cited evidence.
gh-find-prs
Survey open Codewhale PRs and triage each for mergeability and disposition against the real landing branch.
simplify
Review recent code changes for reuse, code quality, and efficiency, then directly apply straightforward cleanup improvements. Use when the user wants a post-implementation cleanup pass, pre-PR polish, or asks to simplify/refine recent changes. Invoke with /simplify or /simplify .
triage
Gatekeep and review GitHub issues and pull requests for Qwen Code maintainers. Use for GitHub Action issue triage, PR admission checks, product-direction review, KISS-focused PR review, and staged bilingual GitHub comments.