Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TaplioOfficial/taplio-linkedin-plugin --skill linkedin-content-calendar-plannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TaplioOfficial/taplio-linkedin-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/taplioofficial/taplio-linkedin-plugin/linkedin-content-calendar-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/taplioofficial/taplio-linkedin-plugin/linkedin-content-calendar-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/taplioofficial/taplio-linkedin-plugin/linkedin-content-calendar-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/taplioofficial/taplio-linkedin-plugin/linkedin-content-calendar-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/taplioofficial/taplio-linkedin-plugin/linkedin-content-calendar-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00116 | $0.02220 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00058 | $0.01110 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00444 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00222 |
Grade A, and why
linkedin-content-calendar-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to linkedin-content-calendar-planner — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LinkedIn Content Calendar Planner
The hardest part of LinkedIn is showing up. A calendar makes showing up the easy default.
When to trigger
The user says "plan my month", "give me a content calendar", "I improvise too much", "what should I post next week ?", "build me 4 weeks of content".
Inputs to ask for
- The user's pillars (from the Content Pillars Builder skill).
- The desired posting cadence (3 / 4 / 5 / 7 posts per week). Default to 4. More is rarely better.
- The audience's time zone and the user's best posting windows (default : Tue-Thu 8am-10am local).
- Any specific milestones in the next month (product launch, event, vacation, big news to react to).
- The mix of formats the user is comfortable with (text, carousel, image, poll, video).
Cadence guidance
- Below 3 posts/week : you do not exist. Hard to grow.
- 3 posts/week : minimum to build momentum. Tue-Wed-Thu.
- 4 to 5 posts/week : the growth zone for most creators.
- Daily : only if the user already has a system AND a strong pipeline of ideas. Otherwise it crashes content quality.
Process
- Ask for the inputs above.
- Build the 4-week grid : 1 post per day on the chosen days.
- For each post, pick :
- Pillar (rotating through them so the audience sees the full positioning).
- Format (text / story / listicle / carousel / opinion / poll / image).
- Topic (specific, not generic).
- Hook angle (the type of opening : curiosity, contrarian, number, etc.).
- CTA goal (comment, share, DM, follow, click).
- Front-load the strongest posts in week 1. New systems lose momentum without early wins.
- Leave 1 "wildcard" slot per week to react to news, trends, or live moments.
- Show the grid and get the user to confirm it. The grid is the plan, not the deliverable.
- Once the grid is confirmed, write a complete, publish-ready post for every non-wildcard slot : a real hook, a full body, and a CTA, in the user's voice. Do not stop at a topic line or a brief : the user should be able to read each post end to end. Create each one as a Taplio draft (see the MCP section). Leave wildcard slots as a one-line prompt, not a full draft.
- Keep the whole calendar in memory : the mapping of slot (week, day, date, pillar) to draft id, draft content, and review status (drafted / approved / scheduled). You will need it to walk the user through review and to schedule on approval.
- Review before scheduling. Walk the user through the drafts one at a time (or in batches if they prefer), let them edit any of them, and only schedule a draft once they approve it. Scheduling is the definitive step : nothing gets a date until the user has seen the actual post.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 123 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A a0b833da8d5c
linkedin-content-calendar-planner is a skill published in the GitHub repository TaplioOfficial/taplio-linkedin-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 2,220 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to linkedin-content-calendar-planner, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
financial-statement-analysis
Reads a set of financial statements and establishes what changed and why — fluctuation analysis against prior period and against budget, profitability, liquidity, solvency and efficiency ratios, benchmarking, and the non-GAAP measures presented alongside them. Use this to interpret results, review a counterparty's or…
youtube-producer
Plans, packages, and scripts long-form video for retention and channel growth — idea selection, titles and thumbnails, script structure, and diagnosing why a video or channel underperforms. Use this for video ideas, packaging, scripting, a retention teardown, or channel strategy — including when someone describes a…
scenario-planning
Plans under genuine uncertainty — building scenarios, identifying which assumptions are load-bearing, setting early-warning indicators, and stress-testing a plan against futures rather than forecasting one. Use this when a decision depends on something unknowable, when a plan assumes conditions that may not hold…
ai-ml-governance
Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory…
paid-advertising
Plans, runs, and optimizes paid acquisition across search, social, and display — account structure, targeting, creative, bidding, budget, and the analysis that says whether to scale or stop. Use this to set up or restructure campaigns, write and iterate ad creative, diagnose rising costs or falling performance, decide…
ai-research-analyst
Produces executive-level research — market sizing, competitor mapping, trend analysis, and strategic intelligence — grounded in cited sources with the confidence in each claim made explicit. Use this to analyze a market or industry, map competitors, evaluate a market-entry or build-versus-buy decision, produce a…