remediation-planner

remediation-planner is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills. It costs 94 tokens per session (991 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A planning workflow that turns audit findings and gaps into ordered, testable repair tasks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to plan remediation after architecture reviews, verification reports, or other gap analyses.
Why use it?
It prevents vague action plans by assigning responsibility, write limits, dependencies, and completion checks.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to plan remediation after architecture reviews, verification reports, or other gap analyses.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/remediation-planner
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills --skill remediation-planner
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for remediation-planner

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/remediation-planner/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/remediation-planner)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/remediation-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/remediation-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for remediation-planner

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/remediation-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/remediation-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 94 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 991 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00094 $0.00991
Opus 5 $0.00047 $0.00495
Sonnet 5 $0.00019 $0.00198
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00099

Measured 8d ago against content hash 1809ffee9997, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

remediation-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/remediation-planner/SKILL.md · 115 lines

What it actually says

整改计划制定(remediation-planner)

把分析结论变成可执行、可验证的行动计划。 没有验收标准的计划不算计划。 基于 closure-orchestration-package 的 remediation-planner-verifier 本地化。


激活后立即执行

Step 1  读取输入
        需要:
        - 差距报告 / 审核报告 / 发现清单(来自 architecture-gap-mapper / verifier / arch-destroyer 等)
        - 约束条件(时间/资源/技术限制)
        - 现有真源文档或代码结构

Step 2  按依赖和严重度分组
        
        【P0 阻断级】不处理会导致系统无法正常运行
        【P1 重要级】影响核心功能或重大风险
        【P2 优化级】改善体验或减少技术债
        
        同时识别依赖关系:哪些问题必须先解决,才能处理其他问题

Step 3  拆解为最小安全步骤
        每个步骤必须:
        - 有明确的负责角色(哪个 Skill/Role 执行)
        - 有明确的写入范围(allowed_write_set)
        - 有明确的完成判断标准(done_criteria)
        - 不能一步改超过 3 个独立的模块

Step 4  为每个步骤配对验证方法
        每个整改步骤必须对应一个验证步骤:
        - 文档修改 → 读者能否按文档走通?
        - 代码修改 → 测试是否通过?
        - 架构调整 → gap-mapper 能否确认差距已消除?

Step 5  标注 branch 结构建议
        输出建议的 branch 划分(供 project-retrospective 参考):
        - 哪些步骤可以并行(互不影响的独立 branch)
        - 哪些步骤必须串行(有依赖的 branch)

Step 6  输出整改计划文档
        写入:[相关目录]/remediation-plan-YYYYMMDD.md

输出格式

# 整改计划

**制定日期**:YYYY-MM-DD
**输入来源**:[差距报告/审核报告名称]
**约束条件**:[时间/资源/技术]

## P0 阻断级整改(必须优先处理)

### P0-01 [整改项名称]
- **问题**:[描述]
- **负责**:[Skill/Role]
- **写入范围**:[文件列表]
- **完成标准**:[可验证条件]
- **验证方法**:[如何验证已修复]
- **依赖**:[必须在此之前完成的项目]

## P1 重要级整改

[同上格式]

## P2 优化级整改

[同上格式]

## 建议 Branch 结构

并行 branch: branch-A: [P0-01 + P0-02](无依赖关系) branch-B: [P1-01](与A无交叉)

串行 branch: branch-C: P0-03(依赖 branch-A 完成)


## 验收总清单

所有 P0/P1 项通过验证后,整改才算完成。

注意事项

  • 没有验证标准的步骤不写入计划:每步必须配验证方法
  • 最小步骤原则:一步只做一件事,方便单独验证和回滚
  • branch 边界清晰:并行的步骤不能写同一真源

变更记录

v1.0 — 2026-03-19 — 初始创建

根因:审核/分析类 Skill(verifier/arch-destroyer/architecture-gap-mapper)产出发现报告后,缺乏一个专门将发现转化为可执行计划的 Skill。基于外部包 remediation-planner-verifier 本地化,加入 branch 结构建议。

验证状态:🔵 待验证

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 115 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A 1809ffee9997

Subscribe to this mod's changes

remediation-planner is a skill published in the GitHub repository TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills (20 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 991 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

team

Coordinate parallel work across multiple Cursor sessions via shared .omc/team/ state.

Jkudjo/oh-my-cursor · 17 tokens

template-helpers

Catalog of the reusable building blocks shipped with this Android template — BaseActivity/BaseFragment, the helpers/ extension files (navigation, lifecycle, toast, snackbar, dialogs, images, permissions, theme, locale, settings intents, date, delay), common/ (Firebase, network, observers), and…

orbitalsonic/AndroidPilot · 92 tokens

android-feature

Workflow for implementing a new Android feature, screen, fragment, activity, dialog, adapter, or enhancement in this XML/MVVM template. Use whenever the user asks to add, build, implement, or extend functionality — before writing any code. Covers planning, the MVVM/MVI skeleton, the Android configuration checklist…

orbitalsonic/AndroidPilot · 72 tokens

android-new-project

Workflow for turning a fresh copy of this Android template into a new app — renaming the package/namespace/applicationId, branding (icons, splash, palette, fonts), Firebase setup, signing config, stripping unused sample screens, and verifying the foundation. Use when the user says they are starting a new app…

orbitalsonic/AndroidPilot · 83 tokens

android-preflight

Final verification checklist to run before declaring Android work finished — build, both themes, string resources, lifecycle and leak risks, registered permissions and components, resource parity between values and values-night, and honest reporting of what was and was not verified. Use at the end of any feature, fix…

orbitalsonic/AndroidPilot · 79 tokens

android-upgrade

Workflow for changing an existing working Android project — upgrading dependencies, AGP/Gradle or SDK levels, migrating deprecated APIs, refactoring, and fixing bugs, without breaking what already works. Covers baseline verification, scoping the diff, targetSdk behaviour changes, SharedPreferences/Room data…

orbitalsonic/AndroidPilot · 86 tokens