Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills --skill skill-domain-health-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/skill-domain-health-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/skill-domain-health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/skill-domain-health-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/skill-domain-health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tashangkd/tashan-cursor-skills/skill-domain-health-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00139 | $0.02187 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00069 | $0.01094 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00437 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00219 |
Grade A, and why
skill-domain-health-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 190 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
域健康检查(skill-domain-health-check)
关系类型:depends-on(依赖 DOMAIN-REGISTRY.md + NODE-IO-CONTRACTS.md) 强绑定 Rule:R2 NO_FABRICATION / R3 READ_FIRST / R6 ARTIFACT_FIRST
检查目标
对指定域(或全部5个域)执行传播完备性验证:
- 节点完整性:DOMAIN-REGISTRY 中的所有节点对应的 Skill 文件真实存在
- I/O 契约满足:NODE-IO-CONTRACTS 中每个节点的输入条件是否可被满足,输出产物是否有明确路径
- 传播完备性:从任意入口节点出发,是否至少有一条路径能到达终态节点
- 域内文档自洽:域内产生的核心文档(产品定义/技术架构等)之间是否互相引用一致
激活后立即执行
Step 1 确认检查范围
询问(如果用户未指定):
「请指定要检查的域:
(1) 产品开发 (2) 认知结构 (3) 公司运营 (4) 内容宣传 (5) Skill体系 (6) 全部」
确认后继续 Step 2。
Step 2 读取形式化描述(R3 READ_FIRST)
用 explore 子智能体并行读取:
- _内部总控/skill-system-design/DOMAIN-REGISTRY.md(必读)
- _内部总控/skill-system-design/NODE-IO-CONTRACTS.md(必读)
- 目标域对应的沙盘文件目录(_内部总控/skill-system-design/sandboxes/[域名]/)
若任一必读文件不存在:
→ 停止执行,告知用户「形式化描述文档缺失,无法执行域健康检查」
→ 建议先运行 DOMAIN-REGISTRY 和 NODE-IO-CONTRACTS 初始化
Step 3 检查一:节点完整性
对 DOMAIN-REGISTRY 中指定域的每个节点:
→ 读取节点对应的 Skill 路径(通常为 .cursor/skills/[skill-name]/SKILL.md)
→ 验证文件是否真实存在(用 Glob 或 ls 确认)
记录:
- ✅ 节点存在:[节点ID] → [Skill路径]
- ❌ 节点缺失:[节点ID] → Skill文件不存在(Gap类型:缺节点)
Step 4 检查二:I/O 契约满足度
对 NODE-IO-CONTRACTS 中指定域的每个节点契约:
【输入侧检查】
→ 该节点的「必需上游文档」路径是否在系统中有可能被创建?
→ 该节点的「必需上下文」是否有明确的创建机制?
【输出侧检查】
→ 该节点的「主产物」文件路径是否明确(非「内联输出」类)?
→ 若为「内联输出」:是否有说明「什么时候保存为文件」?
记录:
- ✅ I/O清晰
- ⚠️ I/O模糊:[具体模糊点](Gap类型:I/O不匹配)
Step 5 检查三:传播完备性(核心检查)
以「图可达性」思维方式执行:
对指定域的每个入口节点:
→ 从该节点出发,沿 DOMAIN-REGISTRY 中的触发边前进
→ 判断:是否至少有一条路径能到达该域的至少一个终态节点
→ 记录路径:[入口节点] → [中间节点...] → [终态节点]
如果某入口节点无法到达任何终态节点:
→ 记录为传播不完备 Gap(Gap类型:传播断裂)
→ 标注断裂点(哪条边缺失或哪个节点有缺陷)
如果某中间节点对所有其出边的触发条件都无法满足:
→ 记录为「死胡同节点」(Gap类型:触发条件不可达)
Step 6 检查四:沙盘 Gap 汇总
读取该域所有沙盘文件(sandboxes/[域名]/*.md):
→ 统计 status = "gap-found" 的沙盘数量
→ 提取所有 Gap 条目(「Gap发现」表格中有Gap的行)
→ 按类型分类(缺节点/缺触发/I-O不匹配/文档不自洽)
→ 统计各类型数量
沙盘 Gap 是已有证据的直接来源,权重高于推断。
Step 7 输出域健康报告(R6:必须写文件)
写入:_内部总控/skill-system-design/domain-health-[域名]-YYYYMMDD.md
格式(见下方「报告格式」)
同时在对话中输出摘要(1-3句话总结)
Step 8 路由后续动作
P0 问题(缺节点 / 传播完全断裂):
→ 立即告知用户,建议优先触发 skill-domain-self-optimizer
P1 问题(I/O模糊 / 沙盘有Gap未修复):
→ 追加到域优化队列,建议下次触发 skill-domain-self-optimizer
P2 优化项:
→ 记录在报告中,不主动路由
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 190 lines · 139 tokens per session scan A 1e47599f4481
skill-domain-health-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills (20 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 139 tokens to every session and 2,187 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
android-preflight
Final verification checklist to run before declaring Android work finished — build, both themes, string resources, lifecycle and leak risks, registered permissions and components, resource parity between values and values-night, and honest reporting of what was and was not verified. Use at the end of any feature, fix…
qa
QA lead testing mode with browser automation. Tests affected pages, fills forms, takes screenshots. Use when user says /qa, wants to test the app, needs QA verification, or wants browser-based testing.
chaos
Failure injection — stress test implementations under hostile conditions before shipping.
qa
Systematic QA pass — test the feature, find bugs, report with repro steps.
android-feature
Workflow for implementing a new Android feature, screen, fragment, activity, dialog, adapter, or enhancement in this XML/MVVM template. Use whenever the user asks to add, build, implement, or extend functionality — before writing any code. Covers planning, the MVVM/MVI skeleton, the Android configuration checklist…
template-helpers
Catalog of the reusable building blocks shipped with this Android template — BaseActivity/BaseFragment, the helpers/ extension files (navigation, lifecycle, toast, snackbar, dialogs, images, permissions, theme, locale, settings intents, date, delay), common/ (Firebase, network, observers), and…