Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tatagoncalvesof/imperatriz-toolkit --skill skill-relatorio-adsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tatagoncalvesof/imperatriz-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tatagoncalvesof/imperatriz-toolkit/skill-relatorio-ads)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tatagoncalvesof/imperatriz-toolkit/skill-relatorio-ads"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tatagoncalvesof/imperatriz-toolkit/skill-relatorio-ads/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tatagoncalvesof/imperatriz-toolkit/skill-relatorio-ads"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tatagoncalvesof/imperatriz-toolkit/skill-relatorio-ads.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00124 | $0.02937 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00062 | $0.01469 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00587 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00294 |
Grade A, and why
skill-relatorio-ads scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 286 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Relatorios de Performance de Ads
Contexto
- Formato: Markdown estruturado, tabelas claras, insights acionaveis
- Periodicidade: Semanal, Mensal, Trimestral
- Plataformas: Meta Ads, Google Ads, TikTok (se aplicavel)
- Moeda: BRL (R$)
Processo
1. Coleta de Dados
Perguntar ao usuario:
- Periodo do relatorio (datas)
- Plataforma(s) a analisar
- Dados disponiveis (export CSV, screenshots, ou manual)
- Tipo de relatorio (semanal/mensal/trimestral)
- Dados financeiros (receita total do periodo, se disponivel)
2. Template de Relatorio Semanal
# Relatorio Semanal de Ads
**Periodo:** [data inicio] a [data fim]
**Plataformas:** [lista]
---
## Resumo Executivo
| Metrica | Esta Semana | Semana Anterior | Variacao |
|---------|-------------|-----------------|----------|
| Investimento | R$ | R$ | % |
| Leads Gerados | # | # | % |
| CPL (Custo por Lead) | R$ | R$ | % |
| Vendas | # | # | % |
| CPA (Custo por Venda) | R$ | R$ | % |
| Receita Atribuida | R$ | R$ | % |
| ROAS (Plataforma) | x | x | % |
| MER (Real) | x | x | % |
**Status Geral:** 🟢 Saudavel / 🟡 Atencao / 🔴 Critico
---
## Performance por Campanha
| Campanha | Gasto | Leads | CPL | Vendas | CPA | ROAS |
|----------|-------|-------|-----|--------|-----|------|
| [Nome 1] | R$ | # | R$ | # | R$ | x |
| [Nome 2] | R$ | # | R$ | # | R$ | x |
| [Nome 3] | R$ | # | R$ | # | R$ | x |
| **Total** | **R$** | **#** | **R$** | **#** | **R$** | **x** |
---
## Performance por Criativo (Top 5)
| Criativo | Formato | Gasto | CTR | CPC | Conversoes | CPA |
|----------|---------|-------|-----|-----|-----------|-----|
| [Nome 1] | Video | R$ | % | R$ | # | R$ |
| [Nome 2] | Imagem | R$ | % | R$ | # | R$ |
| [Nome 3] | Carrossel | R$ | % | R$ | # | R$ |
---
## Alertas
### 🔴 Criticos (Acao Imediata)
- [Alerta com acao recomendada]
### 🟡 Atencao (Monitorar)
- [Alerta com contexto]
### 🟢 Positivos (Manter/Escalar)
- [Destaque positivo com recomendacao]
---
## Acoes para Proxima Semana
1. [Acao 1 — especifica e acionavel]
2. [Acao 2]
3. [Acao 3]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 286 lines · 124 tokens per session scan A b18a1be6ec0f
skill-relatorio-ads is a skill published in the GitHub repository tatagoncalvesof/imperatriz-toolkit (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 124 tokens to every session and 2,937 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
codex-setup
Initialize sd0x-dev-flow infrastructure for Codex CLI and other non-Claude agents. Generates AGENTS.md, installs the commit-msg hook, copies runner scripts. The pre-push gate is opt-in via --with-push-gate. Use when setting up a new project or after updating skills.
smart-rebase
Smart partial rebase for squash-merge repositories. Auto-detect which commits to keep/drop when base branch was squash-merged into target. Use when: user says 'rebase', 'partial rebase', 'base already merged', 'smart rebase', or /smart-rebase. Not for: simple git rebase (the developer runs it — Claude never executes…
test-review
Test coverage review via Codex exec. Use when: reviewing test sufficiency, identifying coverage gaps, test quality audit. Not for: generating tests (use codex-test-gen), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: coverage analysis + gap report.
debug
Interactive debugging workflow with hypothesis-driven probe loop. Use when: unknown bugs, script errors, silent failures, troubleshooting. Not for: known bugs (use bug-fix), GitHub issue analysis (use issue-analyze), code understanding (use code-explore). Output: debug report with probe journal + root cause + fix.
runbook
Generate and update feature release runbooks from existing docs and codebase. Use when: creating operational runbook, release handbook, deployment checklist, pre-release preparation. Not for: incident response (v2), code review (use codex-code-review), architecture design (use architecture).
feature-dev
Feature development workflow. Use when: implementing features, writing code, running dev loop. Not for: understanding code (use code-explore), reviewing code (use codex-code-review). Output: implemented feature + tests + review gate.