do-it-review

do-it-review is a skill for Claude Code from tdwhere123/do-it. It costs 22 tokens per session (287 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review workflow that examines a change against both coding standards and the original request. It can also guide small fixes followed by another review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing pull requests, finding code smells, checking acceptance criteria, applying narrowly scoped repairs, and re-checking the result.
Why use it?
It helps separate style or maintainability issues from cases where the code does not meet the requested behavior.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the do-it plugin — 11 skills, 3 commands, 10 agents, 3 hooks shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/tdwhere123/do-it/do-it-review
Any agent
npx skills add tdwhere123/do-it --skill do-it-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tdwhere123/do-it

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install do-it, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 11 skills, 3 commands, 10 agents, 3 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for do-it-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tdwhere123/do-it/do-it-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tdwhere123/do-it/do-it-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tdwhere123/do-it/do-it-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tdwhere123/do-it/do-it-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 287 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00022 $0.00287
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00143
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00057
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00029

Measured today against content hash c7e8b5877ef3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-05, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

do-it-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/do-it-cursor/skills/do-it-review/SKILL.md · 30 lines

What it actually says

Review

Keep two lenses distinct: Spec asks whether the implementation satisfies the user's requirements, settled decisions, boundaries, and acceptance; Standards asks whether its ownership, contracts, failure behavior, and maintainability are sound. Passing either lens does not close a failure in the other.

Inspect the actual diff, callers, and relevant evidence. An independent context is valuable when the author or parent may be anchored: give the reviewer the goal, scope, decisions, and source facts, not an authoritative parent verdict. Let the reviewer gather evidence and reach their own conclusion.

Collect the complete finding batch before causal repairs when findings may share a root. Cluster related failures, repair the rightful owner, and check the repair's affected surface. Re-review depth follows new changes, remaining doubt, and risk; no fixed number of reviewers or repair rounds applies.

A useful finding identifies its location, consequence, evidence, and needed correction. Distinguish blocking defects, important regressions, and optional improvements. Do not claim clean while material findings remain unresolved; identify anything not checked or deliberately deferred. Use the user's review vocabulary when one is specified.

Review lenses provide optional specialist detail.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today Changed · -66 lines · -12 tokens per session c7e8b5877ef3
  2. yesterday Changed · +23 lines 51c33ed0e42b
  3. 6d ago First seen · 73 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 327ae244b2a4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

do-it-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository tdwhere123/do-it (27 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 287 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.