Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Team-Deepiri/deepiri-axiom --skill efficient-frontiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Team-Deepiri/deepiri-axiomWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/team-deepiri/deepiri-axiom/efficient-frontier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/team-deepiri/deepiri-axiom/efficient-frontier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/team-deepiri/deepiri-axiom/efficient-frontier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/team-deepiri/deepiri-axiom/efficient-frontier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/team-deepiri/deepiri-axiom/efficient-frontier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00559 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00224 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
efficient-frontier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Efficient frontier
Use the expensive model where judgment matters. Push repeatable, bounded, or token-heavy work to cheaper/faster subagents.
Source: BuilderIO/skills (efficient-frontier). MIT.
For Claude Fable specifically, prefer efficient-fable.
Workflow
- Frontier-only: architecture, prioritization, ambiguity, risk, synthesis, final review
- Delegable: repo scans, search, docs extraction, testing passes, log reduction, narrow coding, mechanical edits
- Spawn parallel subagents with clear ownership, bounded scope, verification gates, expected evidence
- Require compact returns: findings, files, commands, residual risk, stop conditions, decisions needed
- Integrate and review centrally before presenting
Handoff packets
Self-contained prompts (assume no chat context): repo path, objective, scope, out-of-scope, targets, return format, verification commands, stop conditions.
Useful stops: code ≠ assumption; verification fails twice; needs files outside scope; no concrete evidence.
Review loop
Treat delegated output as evidence, not verdict. Reopen cited files, skim high-risk diffs, spot-check verification. Resolve disagreements at the frontier layer.
Soft scenarios
- Research — delegate scans/extraction; keep judgment
- Coding — bounded patches when ownership is clear; integrate centrally
- Testing — frontier chooses strategy; cheaper agents run checks/logs and return exact failures
- Debugging — independent theories in parallel; final diagnosis stays frontier
Guardrails
- Do not delegate the immediate blocker you need next
- Do not have multiple agents edit the same files concurrently
- Do not trust high-risk conclusions blindly — inspect evidence
- Pattern works best when exploration/implementation can parallelize
Default framing
Use the frontier model as orchestrator and reviewer; cheaper subagents for token-heavy research, coding, or testing so expensive tokens go to judgment and final quality.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 60 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A add66966d081
efficient-frontier is a skill published in the GitHub repository Team-Deepiri/deepiri-axiom (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 559 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-26.
efficient-frontier compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| efficient-frontierTeam-Deepiri/deepiri-axiom | Skill | 2 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 133k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 313k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |