Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Teaonly/SKILL.mk --skill triage-issuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Teaonly/SKILL.mkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/teaonly/skill.mk/triage-issue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/teaonly/skill.mk/triage-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/teaonly/skill.mk/triage-issue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/teaonly/skill.mk/triage-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/teaonly/skill.mk/triage-issue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00848 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00339 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
triage-issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- triage-issue — 100% identical, 1 lines differ
- triage-issue — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- triage-issue — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Triage Issue
Investigate a reported problem, find its root cause, and create a GitHub issue with a TDD fix plan. This is a mostly hands-off workflow - minimize questions to the user.
Process
1. Capture the problem
Get a brief description of the issue from the user. If they haven't provided one, ask ONE question: "What's the problem you're seeing?"
Do NOT ask follow-up questions yet. Start investigating immediately.
2. Explore and diagnose
Use the Agent tool with subagent_type=Explore to deeply investigate the codebase. Your goal is to find:
- Where the bug manifests (entry points, UI, API responses)
- What code path is involved (trace the flow)
- Why it fails (the root cause, not just the symptom)
- What related code exists (similar patterns, tests, adjacent modules)
Look at:
- Related source files and their dependencies
- Existing tests (what's tested, what's missing)
- Recent changes to affected files (
git logon relevant files) - Error handling in the code path
- Similar patterns elsewhere in the codebase that work correctly
3. Identify the fix approach
Based on your investigation, determine:
- The minimal change needed to fix the root cause
- Which modules/interfaces are affected
- What behaviors need to be verified via tests
- Whether this is a regression, missing feature, or design flaw
4. Design TDD fix plan
Create a concrete, ordered list of RED-GREEN cycles. Each cycle is one vertical slice:
- RED: Describe a specific test that captures the broken/missing behavior
- GREEN: Describe the minimal code change to make that test pass
Rules:
- Tests verify behavior through public interfaces, not implementation details
- One test at a time, vertical slices (NOT all tests first, then all code)
- Each test should survive internal refactors
- Include a final refactor step if needed
- Durability: Only suggest fixes that would survive radical codebase changes. Describe behaviors and contracts, not internal structure. Tests assert on observable outcomes (API responses, UI state, user-visible effects), not internal state. A good suggestion reads like a spec; a bad one reads like a diff.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 103 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 834e528eb0d4
triage-issue is a skill published in the GitHub repository Teaonly/SKILL.mk (103 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 848 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.
build-test
Run the project's build / typecheck / lint / test commands and emit the build.passing + tests.passing signals devloop convergence reads.
resolve-author-fix
Find the root cause, implement a focused fix, and prove behavior with targeted tests and recordings.
behavior-contract
Bug condition/postcondition formalization as testable Behavior Contracts. Defines invariants that must be preserved across fixes.
nw-bugfix
Bug fix workflow: root cause analysis → user review → regression test + fix via TDD.
08-debug
Reproduce and fix a known bug, or find an unknown root cause by hypothesis validation. Use when the user wants to fix a bug, find why something breaks, or reopen a stuck investigation. Not for building a feature or reviewing a diff.