geo-content

geo-content is a skill for Claude Code from techhorizonlabs/thl-open. It costs 31 tokens per session (3,893 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of geo-content, MIT.

A content review that checks whether pages show real experience, expertise, authority, and trust, and whether AI systems can find and quote their claims.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess pages, readability, structure, depth, signs of content quality, and whether a site has built enough coverage of its subject.
Why use it?
It identifies content weaknesses that can make a page harder for people and AI search tools to understand or trust.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is **Provenance (THL):** tag the score `[scan]` (data fetched this run), `[partial-scan]`, `[heuristic]` (judgement, no data), or `[unmeasured]` — and emit `—` ins.

Part of the thl-open plugin — 17 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to assess pages, readability, structure, depth, signs of content quality, and whether a site has built enough coverage of its subject.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/techhorizonlabs/thl-open
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/techhorizonlabs/thl-open/geo-content

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install thl-open, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 17 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for geo-content

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/techhorizonlabs/thl-open/geo-content/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/techhorizonlabs/thl-open/geo-content)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/techhorizonlabs/thl-open/geo-content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/techhorizonlabs/thl-open/geo-content/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for geo-content

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/techhorizonlabs/thl-open/geo-content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/techhorizonlabs/thl-open/geo-content.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 31 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,893 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00031 $0.03893
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.01946
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00779
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00389

Measured 9d ago against content hash 2319c03e8d4a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

geo-content scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to geo-content — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/geo-content/SKILL.md · 348 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 348 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

GEO Content Quality & E-E-A-T Assessment

Purpose

AI search platforms do not just find content — they evaluate whether content deserves to be cited. The primary framework for this evaluation is E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness), from Google's Search Quality Rater Guidelines. E-E-A-T began as a YMYL (Your Money Your Life) lens but is now widely applied by raters well beyond YMYL topics; treat strong E-E-A-T as table stakes for any competitive query. Content that scores high on E-E-A-T is materially more likely to be cited by AI platforms. (See docs/SOURCES.md for the guidelines reference and dates.)

This skill evaluates content through two lenses:

  1. E-E-A-T signals — does the content demonstrate real expertise and trust?
  2. AI citability — is the content structured so AI platforms can extract and cite specific claims?

How to Use This Skill

  1. Fetch the target page(s) — homepage, key blog posts, service/product pages
  2. Evaluate E-E-A-T across the 4 dimensions (25% each)
  3. Assess content quality metrics (structure, readability, depth)
  4. Check for AI content quality signals
  5. Evaluate topical authority across the site
  6. Score and generate GEO-CONTENT-ANALYSIS.md

E-E-A-T Framework (100 points total)

Experience — 25 points

First-hand knowledge and direct involvement with the topic. AI platforms increasingly distinguish between content that reports on a topic and content from someone who has DONE it.

Signals to evaluate:

Signal Points How to Score
First-person accounts ("I tested...", "We implemented...") 5 5 if present and specific, 3 if generic, 0 if absent
Original research or data not available elsewhere 5 5 if original data, 3 if references original work, 0 if none
Case studies with specific results 4 4 if detailed with numbers, 2 if general, 0 if none
Screenshots, photos, or evidence of direct use 3 3 if authentic evidence, 1 if stock/generic, 0 if none
Specific examples from personal experience 4 4 if specific and unique, 2 if somewhat specific, 0 if generic
Demonstrations of process (not just outcome) 4 4 if step-by-step from experience, 2 if partial, 0 if none

Read the full file on GitHub · 348 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 348 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 2319c03e8d4a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

geo-content is a skill published in the GitHub repository techhorizonlabs/thl-open (15 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 3,893 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to geo-content, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

geo-content

Content quality and E-E-A-T assessment for AI citability — evaluate experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness, and content structure.

asale-ai/seo-geo-skill · 31 tokens

geo-content

Content quality and E-E-A-T assessment for AI citability — evaluate experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness, and content structure.

zubair-trabzada/geo-seo-claude · 31 tokens

geo-content

Content quality and E-E-A-T assessment for AI citability — evaluate experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness, and content structure.

KSfak/Zubair-Trabzada-YouTube · 31 tokens

geo-visibility

Get cited and recommended by AI engines (ChatGPT, AI Overviews and AI Mode, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini). Input: a page or piece of content. Output: passage-level citability fixes (answer-first H2 blocks, self-contained chunks, definitions, sourced stats, comparison tables), a 5-pillar GEO score (0-100), an AI-crawler…

Thibaultbm/claude-seo-geo · 133 tokens

seo-content-collection-page

Optimize e-commerce collection, category, and product listing pages (PLPs) for Google and AI assistants. Input: a collection or category page (Shopify, WooCommerce, Magento, BigCommerce, PrestaShop, or custom). Output: a bottom-of-page SEO text block, faceted-navigation and filter URL control, pagination canonicals…

Thibaultbm/claude-seo-geo · 122 tokens

geo-tracking

Measure AI visibility without paid tools or API keys. Input: your site (GA4 and server logs) and a buyer prompt panel. Output: GA4 AI-traffic reporting (custom channel group plus referrer regex above Referral), monthly brand mention rate, citation rate, and share of voice versus competitors across ChatGPT, Perplexity…

Thibaultbm/claude-seo-geo · 121 tokens