Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins/ingestnpx skills add technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins --skill ingestgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins/ingest)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins/ingest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins/ingest.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00811 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00405 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
ingest scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ingest Stage
Turn a raw session notes file (type: session-notes) into an ingested
insight, ready for the enrich stage. Defaults to keeping it as one
note — see "Exception" below for when to split.
See references/pipeline.md for stage definitions and status flow.
Input
A session notes file in the inbox with status: raw and type: session-notes.
Default: enrich whole
Most session notes — including every devlog-produced one — are already
well-organized: one session, one provenance (repo/branch/bean), a handful
of related bullets. Splitting them into N separate notes mints
near-duplicate notes that mostly route to the same destination anyway — a
real run against 32 session notes would have exploded into 120-140
near-duplicates that mostly filed to the same destination.
Default behavior: keep the session note as ONE note. Change its frontmatter in place, using the Edit tool:
status: raw→status: ingestedtype: session-notes→type: insight
Don't create any new files. Don't touch the body — enrich handles prose
cleanup next.
Exception: split when bullets genuinely diverge
Check for a real cross-topic signal before splitting — not a bullet count. Read the note's bullets:
-
If every bullet shares the same repo/branch/bean context (the common case, and always true for a single
devlogsession), keep it whole. -
If bullets explicitly reference different repos, branches, or beans within the same file (only possible in hand-authored or legacy multi-topic session notes —
devlogoutput never does this), split those bullets into separate notes instead:There's no structured per-bullet frontmatter for this — repo/branch/bean only ever exist once, at the file level. Infer divergence from what the bullet text itself says (e.g. a bullet's prose names a different repo than the file's own frontmatter, or than another bullet).
- For each insight, create a new note via
sb note create --source auto --title "{insight title}"withstatus: ingested,type: insight,source-session: {original session filename}, and that bullet's own repo/branch/bean. - Write the note body (the bullet text, cleaned into a sentence or short paragraph) using the Write tool.
- Update the original session file's status to
ingestedusing the Edit tool — it stays in the inbox as a record, not processed further. - Skip empty or trivial bullets when splitting (single words, fragments).
- For each insight, create a new note via
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 82 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A adf4ef648884
ingest is a skill published in the GitHub repository technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins (10 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 811 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
development
开发语言能力索引。Python、Go、Rust、TypeScript、Java、C++、Shell。当用户提到编程、开发、代码、语言时路由到此。.
post-build-flow
Handles workflow verification and setup after build-workflow succeeds, or when the message contains workflow-verification-follow-up or workflow-setup-required. Load after direct builds, when verificationReadiness requires action, or on orchestrator verify/setup follow-up turns.
n8n:create-pr
Creates GitHub pull requests with properly formatted titles that pass the check-pr-title CI validation. Use when creating PRs, submitting changes for review, or when the user says /pr or asks to create a pull request.
flow-next-tracker-sync
Project a flow-next spec to a tracker issue (Linear, GitHub, GitLab, Jira) and reconcile two-way. Use when asked to sync to a tracker. NOT plan-sync.
n8n:reproduce-bug
Reproduce a bug from a Linear ticket with a failing test. Expects the full ticket context (title, description, comments) to be provided as input.
debugging-executions
Debug failed or wrong-output workflow executions using executions tools. Load when the user reports execution failures, unexpected node output, empty parameter values after a successful run, or a node showing a red or failed expression error.