Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins/pushnpx skills add technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins --skill pushgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/technicalpickles/pickled-claude-pluginsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00069 | $0.00602 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00301 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00120 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
push scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Push
Preferences for git push, especially diagnosing failures.
Reading push failure output
When git push exits non-zero, output mixes three layers:
- SSH/transport (key offered, accepted)
- Hook driver header (lefthook, husky, pre-commit, etc.)
- Hook output (test/lint/coverage walls)
Identify the failed layer before debugging:
lefthookorhook: pre-push→ pre-push hook failed; transport was finePermission denied (publickey)→ SSH auth refused! [rejected]/non-fast-forward→ push needs rebase
A wall of test or coverage output is NOT an SSH problem. The hook ran tests, the tests failed, the push was blocked.
pre-push hook failures
Same rules as pre-commit failures in the commit skill: analyze the failures, autofix when possible, ask the user when unclear. Do NOT skip with --no-verify without explicit confirmation.
Debugging SSH
Before adding -v to debug an SSH issue, check whether core.sshCommand is configured:
git config --get core.sshCommand
If it returns nothing, GIT_SSH_COMMAND="ssh -v" git push origin <branch> is fine.
If it returns anything (custom IdentityFile, IdentityAgent, deploy-key flags, etc.), DO NOT use GIT_SSH_COMMAND="ssh -v". It REPLACES core.sshCommand entirely, dropping every flag. Output will look like the wrong keys are being offered, because they are, but only because you removed the constraint.
Append -v to the existing command instead:
GIT_SSH_COMMAND="$(git config core.sshCommand) -v" git push origin <branch>
Background push gotcha
If you started a push with run_in_background and then ran a foreground retry (e.g., because the first looked stuck), the background push may have already succeeded. Before re-investigating "why is push failing":
git -C <worktree> log --oneline origin/<branch>..HEAD. Empty output means the push went through.- Verify retry's cwd:
pwdandgit rev-parse --show-toplevel. gh pr view <pr>to see if the commit landed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 57 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 6daf7adac87a
push is a skill published in the GitHub repository technicalpickles/pickled-claude-plugins (10 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 602 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
verify-security
安全校验关卡。自动扫描代码安全漏洞，检测危险模式，确保安全决策有文档记录。当用户提到安全扫描、漏洞检测、安全审计、代码安全、OWASP、注入检测、敏感信息泄露时使用。在新建模块、安全相关变更、攻防任务、重构完成时自动触发。.
development
开发语言能力索引。Python、Go、Rust、TypeScript、Java、C++、Shell。当用户提到编程、开发、代码、语言时路由到此。.
post-build-flow
Handles workflow verification and setup after build-workflow succeeds, or when the message contains workflow-verification-follow-up or workflow-setup-required. Load after direct builds, when verificationReadiness requires action, or on orchestrator verify/setup follow-up turns.
n8n:create-pr
Creates GitHub pull requests with properly formatted titles that pass the check-pr-title CI validation. Use when creating PRs, submitting changes for review, or when the user says /pr or asks to create a pull request.
n8n:reproduce-bug
Reproduce a bug from a Linear ticket with a failing test. Expects the full ticket context (title, description, comments) to be provided as input.